UCC vs. DNNG
UCC (ProShares Ultra Consumer Services) and DNNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long DNN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - UCC tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%) while DNNG tracks the Denison Mines Corp. (DNN). Both are passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UCC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DNNG.
Performance
UCC vs. DNNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UCC
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- 6M
- -12.26%
- YTD
- -8.35%
- 1Y
- 5.17%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- -0.94%
- 10Y*
- 13.39%
DNNG
- 1D
- -5.11%
- 1M
- -16.22%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UCC vs. DNNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services | -4.39% |
DNNG Leverage Shares 2X Long DNN Daily ETF | -52.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCC and DNNG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCC vs. DNNG — Risk / Return Rank
UCC
DNNG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UCC vs. DNNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) and Leverage Shares 2X Long DNN Daily ETF (DNNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UCC | DNNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.45 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UCC vs. DNNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCC drawdown since its inception was -83.05%, which is greater than DNNG's maximum drawdown of -65.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCC and DNNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCC | DNNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.05% | -65.39% | -17.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.17% | -60.36% | +42.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.78% | -37.34% | +15.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.42% | — | — |
Volatility
UCC vs. DNNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCC | DNNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.29% | 114.40% | -77.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.00% | 114.40% | -70.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.75% | 114.40% | -73.65% |
UCC vs. DNNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DNNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UCC vs. DNNG - Dividend Comparison
UCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while DNNG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNNG Leverage Shares 2X Long DNN Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services | 1.26% | 1.10% | 0.17% | 0.04% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UCC and DNNG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DNNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DNNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UCC.
UCC has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.00% for DNNG.
UCC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%), while DNNG tracks Denison Mines Corp. (DNN). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UCC and 0.75% for DNNG.
Find the right allocation for UCC and DNNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer