UCC vs. BITI
UCC (ProShares Ultra Consumer Services) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UCC is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%), while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UCC returned 11.27%/yr vs -31.77%/yr for BITI. Their -0.38 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. UCC charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.
Performance
UCC vs. BITI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCC achieves a -10.17% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 27.11% return.
UCC
- 1D
- 6.81%
- 1M
- -2.69%
- 6M
- -11.97%
- YTD
- -10.17%
- 1Y
- 6.57%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- -1.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.11%
BITI
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- 6M
- 22.77%
- YTD
- 27.11%
- 1Y
- 58.64%
- 3Y*
- -31.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -35.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.10M | $26.49M | $38.71M | |
| $269.06K | $187.07K | $175.51K |
UCC vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services | -10.17% | 2.21% | 44.24% | 61.67% | -2.82% |
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 27.11% | -1.76% | -62.60% | -66.17% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCC and BITI is -0.38, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022 | -0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCC vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank
UCC
BITI
UCC vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UCC | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.24 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | 2.53 | -2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.12 | 6.17 | -6.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UCC vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCC drawdown since its inception was -83.05%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCC and BITI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCC | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.05% | -92.16% | +9.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.14% | -25.28% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.01% | -84.63% | +36.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.80% | -86.12% | +66.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.79% | -68.59% | +46.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.30% | 10.35% | +1.95% |
Volatility
UCC vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) has a higher volatility of 14.65% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 9.13%. This indicates that UCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCC | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.65% | 9.13% | +5.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.34% | 33.31% | -2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.06% | 44.23% | -5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.23% | 52.03% | -7.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.95% | 52.03% | -11.08% |
UCC vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
UCC vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison
UCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than BITI's 15.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 15.17% | 1.60% | 3.91% | 3.33% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services | 1.28% | 1.10% | 0.17% | 0.04% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UCC and BITI have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UCC has higher volatility (14.65%) compared to BITI (9.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCC dropped -83.05% vs BITI's -92.16%.
On 3-year performance, UCC leads with 11.27% vs -31.77% for BITI. On fees, UCC is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 9.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, UCC has performed better with a 11.27% return vs -31.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UCC is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.
BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.17%, compared with 1.28% for UCC.
UCC is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. UCC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%), while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UCC and 1.03% for BITI.
BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UCC and BITI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer