UC99.L vs. UC15.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UC99.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and UC15.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UC99.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while UC15.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UC99.L returned 16.19%/yr vs 9.68%/yr for UC15.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UC99.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UC15.L.

Performance

UC99.L vs. UC15.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC99.L achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly lower than UC15.L's 21.49% return. Over the past 10 years, UC99.L has outperformed UC15.L with an annualized return of 16.19%, while UC15.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.68% annualized return.

UC99.L

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 6.73%
• YTD: 10.42%
• 6M: 10.82%
• 1Y: 29.48%
• 3Y*: 17.61%
• 5Y*: 13.98%
• 10Y*: 16.19%

UC15.L

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: -0.91%
• YTD: 21.49%
• 6M: 22.05%
• 1Y: 32.45%
• 3Y*: 10.32%
• 5Y*: 12.77%
• 10Y*: 9.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC99.L vs. UC15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	10.42%	8.68%	22.60%	27.58%	-15.03%	28.64%	16.43%	32.55%	0.49%	12.84%
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	21.49%	2.57%	6.44%	-6.52%	29.97%	36.11%	-2.49%	5.31%	-5.25%	-2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between UC99.L and UC15.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015	0.28

The correlation between UC99.L and UC15.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UC99.L vs. UC15.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UC99.L	UC15.L
Technology	54.7%	31.0%
Industrials	13.3%	6.6%
Healthcare	10.9%	9.8%
Communication Services	7.9%	15.0%
Financial Services	7.3%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	3.7%
Utilities	0.1%	1.1%
Basic Materials	0.0%	0.5%
Energy	-	14.2%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

UC99.L vs. UC15.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC99.L

UC99.L Risk / Return Rank: 70
UC99.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
UC99.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
UC99.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
UC99.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
UC99.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

UC15.L

UC15.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
UC15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
UC15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
UC15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
UC15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
UC15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC99.L vs. UC15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UC99.L	UC15.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.12	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	2.77	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.39	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	5.23	-2.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.14	13.93	-2.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UC99.L vs. UC15.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC99.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the UC15.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC99.L and UC15.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UC99.L	UC15.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	2.12	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.87	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98	0.66	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	0.33	+0.66

Drawdowns

UC99.L vs. UC15.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC99.L drawdown since its inception was -23.20%, smaller than the maximum UC15.L drawdown of -42.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC99.L and UC15.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UC99.L	UC15.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.20%	-42.93%	+19.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.47%	-6.18%	-3.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.20%	-13.98%	-9.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.20%	-17.43%	-5.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.20%	-30.26%	+7.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.53%	+3.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.24%	-15.17%	+10.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	2.32%	+0.32%

Volatility

UC99.L vs. UC15.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) is 3.33%, while UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that UC99.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UC99.L	UC15.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	5.07%	-1.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.62%	12.34%	-3.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.19%	15.26%	-3.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.02%	14.69%	+1.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.54%	14.80%	+1.74%

UC99.L vs. UC15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC99.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than UC15.L's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

UC99.L vs. UC15.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UC99.L nor UC15.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UC99.L and UC15.L in my portfolio?

UC99.L and UC15.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UC99.L or UC15.L?

On fees, UC99.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UC99.L or UC15.L?

UC99.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UC15.L.

What is the main difference between UC99.L and UC15.L?

UC99.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UC15.L is Commodities. UC99.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UC99.L and 0.34% for UC15.L.