UC98.L vs. USDG.L

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

UC98.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and USDG.L (L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, from UBS and Legal & General respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UC98.L returned 1.03%/yr vs 2.09%/yr for USDG.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UC98.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for USDG.L.

Performance

UC98.L vs. USDG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC98.L) and L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (USDG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC98.L achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly lower than USDG.L's 3.23% return.

UC98.L

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 3.34%
• YTD: 2.66%
• 6M: 3.49%
• 1Y: 8.23%
• 3Y*: 3.76%
• 5Y*: 1.03%
• 10Y*: 2.30%

USDG.L

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 3.24%
• YTD: 3.23%
• 6M: 4.07%
• 1Y: 8.79%
• 3Y*: 4.38%
• 5Y*: 2.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC98.L vs. USDG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
UC98.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	2.66%	0.33%	3.62%	2.43%	-7.46%	0.32%
USDG.L L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF	3.23%	0.15%	4.74%	2.41%	-3.62%	-26.09%

Correlation

The correlation between UC98.L and USDG.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2021	0.93

The correlation between UC98.L and USDG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UC98.L vs. USDG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC98.L

UC98.L Risk / Return Rank: 41
UC98.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
UC98.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
UC98.L Omega Ratio Rank: 43
UC98.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
UC98.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

USDG.L

USDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 36
USDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
USDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
USDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 38
USDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
USDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC98.L vs. USDG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC98.L) and L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (USDG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UC98.L	USDG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.10	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	1.63	+0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.23	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	1.93	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.05	4.38	-0.33

UC98.L vs. USDG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC98.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the USDG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC98.L and USDG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UC98.L vs. USDG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC98.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, which is greater than USDG.L's maximum drawdown of -32.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC98.L and USDG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UC98.L	USDG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.07%	-32.44%	-3.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.86%	-4.53%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.30%	-8.61%	+0.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.17%	-12.81%	-1.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.60%	-21.14%	+13.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.43%	-26.95%	+12.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	2.00%	+0.03%

Volatility

UC98.L vs. USDG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC98.L) is 1.65%, while L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (USDG.L) has a volatility of 1.84%. This indicates that UC98.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USDG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UC98.L	USDG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.65%	1.84%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.48%	6.85%	-2.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.03%	7.99%	-1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.95%	8.65%	+0.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.91%	14.56%	-4.65%

UC98.L vs. USDG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC98.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than USDG.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UC98.L vs. USDG.L - Dividend Comparison

UC98.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than USDG.L's 4.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UC98.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	4.36%	5.96%	4.81%	3.91%	2.35%	2.01%	2.72%	3.27%	2.04%	1.74%
USDG.L L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF	4.56%	4.70%	3.99%	3.26%	2.24%	0.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UC98.L and USDG.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, UC98.L and USDG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, UC98.L or USDG.L?

On fees, USDG.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UC98.L or USDG.L?

USDG.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UC98.L.

What is the main difference between UC98.L and USDG.L?

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UC98.L and 0.09% for USDG.L.