UC98.L vs. S5SD.L

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

UC98.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and S5SD.L (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - UC98.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while S5SD.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UC98.L returned 1.03%/yr vs 15.07%/yr for S5SD.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UC98.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for S5SD.L.

Performance

UC98.L vs. S5SD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC98.L) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC98.L achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly lower than S5SD.L's 11.04% return.

UC98.L

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 3.34%
• YTD: 2.66%
• 6M: 3.49%
• 1Y: 8.23%
• 3Y*: 3.76%
• 5Y*: 1.03%
• 10Y*: 2.30%

S5SD.L

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 2.14%
• YTD: 11.04%
• 6M: 11.48%
• 1Y: 31.54%
• 3Y*: 19.40%
• 5Y*: 15.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC98.L vs. S5SD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
UC98.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	2.66%	0.33%	3.62%	2.43%	-7.46%	-1.33%	6.37%	10.42%
S5SD.L UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis	11.04%	9.98%	26.33%	21.21%	-8.47%	33.83%	14.91%	-10.18%

Correlation

The correlation between UC98.L and S5SD.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019	0.23

The correlation between UC98.L and S5SD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (5 years) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

UC98.L vs. S5SD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC98.L

UC98.L Risk / Return Rank: 41
UC98.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
UC98.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
UC98.L Omega Ratio Rank: 43
UC98.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
UC98.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

S5SD.L

S5SD.L Risk / Return Rank: 91
S5SD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
S5SD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
S5SD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 92
S5SD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
S5SD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC98.L vs. S5SD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC98.L) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UC98.L	S5SD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	2.89	-1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	3.96	-1.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.53	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	4.50	-2.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.05	17.37	-13.31

UC98.L vs. S5SD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC98.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the S5SD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC98.L and S5SD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UC98.L vs. S5SD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC98.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, which is greater than S5SD.L's maximum drawdown of -29.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC98.L and S5SD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UC98.L	S5SD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.07%	-29.66%	-6.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.86%	-6.97%	+2.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.30%	-21.45%	+13.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.17%	-21.45%	+7.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.60%	-0.55%	-7.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.43%	-5.66%	-8.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	1.81%	+0.22%

Volatility

UC98.L vs. S5SD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC98.L) is 1.65%, while UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that UC98.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than S5SD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UC98.L	S5SD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.65%	3.61%	-1.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.48%	7.69%	-3.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.03%	10.88%	-4.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.95%	14.47%	-5.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.91%	18.16%	-8.25%

UC98.L vs. S5SD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC98.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than S5SD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UC98.L vs. S5SD.L - Dividend Comparison

UC98.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than S5SD.L's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
S5SD.L UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis	0.74%	0.91%	0.91%	1.16%	1.22%	0.93%	1.40%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%
UC98.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	4.36%	5.96%	4.81%	3.91%	2.35%	2.01%	2.72%	3.27%	2.04%	1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UC98.L and S5SD.L in my portfolio?

UC98.L and S5SD.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UC98.L or S5SD.L?

On fees, S5SD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UC98.L or S5SD.L?

S5SD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UC98.L.

What is the main difference between UC98.L and S5SD.L?

UC98.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while S5SD.L is S&P 500. UC98.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while S5SD.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UC98.L and 0.12% for S5SD.L.