UC98.L vs. 5ESG.L

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

UC98.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and 5ESG.L (UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - UC98.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while 5ESG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UC98.L returned 1.03%/yr vs 12.61%/yr for 5ESG.L. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. UC98.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for 5ESG.L.

Performance

UC98.L vs. 5ESG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC98.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC98.L achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly lower than 5ESG.L's 8.13% return.

UC98.L

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 3.34%
• YTD: 2.66%
• 6M: 3.49%
• 1Y: 8.23%
• 3Y*: 3.76%
• 5Y*: 1.03%
• 10Y*: 2.30%

5ESG.L

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 8.13%
• 6M: 8.15%
• 1Y: 26.44%
• 3Y*: 20.12%
• 5Y*: 12.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC98.L vs. 5ESG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
UC98.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	2.66%	0.33%	3.62%	2.43%	-7.46%	-1.33%	6.37%	10.42%
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist	8.13%	18.26%	23.62%	26.17%	-20.24%	31.59%	15.83%	16.65%

Correlation

The correlation between UC98.L and 5ESG.L is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019	-0.13

Return for Risk

UC98.L vs. 5ESG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC98.L

UC98.L Risk / Return Rank: 41
UC98.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
UC98.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
UC98.L Omega Ratio Rank: 43
UC98.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
UC98.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

5ESG.L

5ESG.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
5ESG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
5ESG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 78
5ESG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
5ESG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC98.L vs. 5ESG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC98.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UC98.L	5ESG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	2.21	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	3.31	-1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.40	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	2.92	-1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.05	12.63	-8.57

UC98.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC98.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the 5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC98.L and 5ESG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UC98.L vs. 5ESG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC98.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, roughly equal to the maximum 5ESG.L drawdown of -36.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC98.L and 5ESG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UC98.L	5ESG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.07%	-36.07%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.86%	-9.01%	+4.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.30%	-19.53%	+11.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.17%	-25.41%	+11.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.60%	-1.85%	-5.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.43%	-5.37%	-9.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	2.09%	-0.06%

Volatility

UC98.L vs. 5ESG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC98.L) is 1.65%, while UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that UC98.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 5ESG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UC98.L	5ESG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.65%	4.19%	-2.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.48%	9.27%	-4.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.03%	11.99%	-5.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.95%	16.24%	-7.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.91%	18.05%	-8.14%

UC98.L vs. 5ESG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC98.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than 5ESG.L's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UC98.L vs. 5ESG.L - Dividend Comparison

UC98.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than 5ESG.L's 0.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist	0.63%	0.87%	0.47%	1.07%	1.32%	0.89%	1.25%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%
UC98.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	4.36%	5.96%	4.81%	3.91%	2.35%	2.01%	2.72%	3.27%	2.04%	1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UC98.L and 5ESG.L in my portfolio?

UC98.L and 5ESG.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UC98.L or 5ESG.L?

On fees, 5ESG.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UC98.L or 5ESG.L?

5ESG.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UC98.L.

What is the main difference between UC98.L and 5ESG.L?

UC98.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while 5ESG.L is S&P 500. UC98.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while 5ESG.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UC98.L and 0.17% for 5ESG.L.