UC96.L vs. S5EE.L
UC96.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and S5EE.L (UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UC96.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while S5EE.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Elite ESG Index USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UC96.L returned 9.88%/yr vs 15.96%/yr for S5EE.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UC96.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for S5EE.L.
Performance
UC96.L vs. S5EE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC96.L achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly lower than S5EE.L's 23.53% return.
UC96.L
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 9.96%
- 6M
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 23.09%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.88%
- 10Y*
- 12.43%
S5EE.L
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- 23.53%
- 6M
- 24.04%
- 1Y
- 44.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.81%
- 5Y*
- 15.96%
- 10Y*
- —
UC96.L vs. S5EE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC96.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 9.96% | 4.85% | 9.71% | 9.45% | 3.22% | 24.16% |
S5EE.L UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc | 23.53% | 11.67% | 20.01% | 22.12% | -9.06% | -7.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between UC96.L and S5EE.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2021 | 0.78 |
The correlation between UC96.L and S5EE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UC96.L vs. S5EE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UC96.L
S5EE.L
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
UC96.L
S5EE.L
Industrials
UC96.L
S5EE.L
Healthcare
UC96.L
S5EE.L
Financial Services
UC96.L
S5EE.L
Basic Materials
UC96.L
S5EE.L
Consumer Defensive
UC96.L
S5EE.L
Communication Services
UC96.L
S5EE.L
Consumer Cyclical
UC96.L
S5EE.L
Energy
UC96.L
S5EE.L
-
Utilities
UC96.L
S5EE.L
-
Real Estate
UC96.L
-
S5EE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UC96.L vs. S5EE.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC96.L
S5EE.L
UC96.L vs. S5EE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) and UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UC96.L | S5EE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.65 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 5.27 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.86 | 19.55 | -8.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UC96.L vs. S5EE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC96.L drawdown since its inception was -26.78%, roughly equal to the maximum S5EE.L drawdown of -28.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC96.L and S5EE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC96.L | S5EE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.78% | -28.17% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.87% | -8.61% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.90% | -20.25% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.90% | -20.25% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.57% | +1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -8.65% | +4.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 2.32% | -0.23% |
Volatility
UC96.L vs. S5EE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) is 2.63%, while UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that UC96.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than S5EE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UC96.L | S5EE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 5.41% | -2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | 9.97% | -2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.69% | 12.67% | -1.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 14.94% | -0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 19.22% | -3.50% |
UC96.L vs. S5EE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC96.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than S5EE.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UC96.L vs. S5EE.L - Dividend Comparison
UC96.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while S5EE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S5EE.L UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC96.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.12% | 1.21% | 0.69% | 1.53% | 1.53% | 1.62% | 1.84% | 1.39% | 1.86% | 1.58% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UC96.L and S5EE.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, S5EE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
S5EE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC96.L.
UC96.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while S5EE.L is S&P 500. UC96.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while S5EE.L tracks S&P 500 Elite ESG Index USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UC96.L and 0.15% for S5EE.L.
Find the right allocation for UC96.L and S5EE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer