PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC96.L vs. S5EE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC96.L vs. S5EE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) and UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC96.L achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly lower than S5EE.L's 23.53% return.


UC96.L

1D
1.40%
1M
3.96%
YTD
9.96%
6M
10.45%
1Y
23.09%
3Y*
11.72%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
12.43%

S5EE.L

1D
0.51%
1M
6.18%
YTD
23.53%
6M
24.04%
1Y
44.90%
3Y*
22.81%
5Y*
15.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC96.L vs. S5EE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UC96.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
9.96%4.85%9.71%9.45%3.22%24.16%
S5EE.L
UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc
23.53%11.67%20.01%22.12%-9.06%-7.03%

Correlation

The correlation between UC96.L and S5EE.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2021

0.78

The correlation between UC96.L and S5EE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UC96.L vs. S5EE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UC96.L
S5EE.L

Technology

23.6%
50.7%

Industrials

18.8%
8.9%

Healthcare

18.6%
10.8%

Financial Services

18.0%
15.0%

Basic Materials

5.5%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
3.0%

Communication Services

4.1%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
4.4%

Energy

1.8%

-

Utilities

0.4%

-

Real Estate

-

2.6%

Technology

UC96.L
23.6%
S5EE.L
50.7%

Industrials

UC96.L
18.8%
S5EE.L
8.9%

Healthcare

UC96.L
18.6%
S5EE.L
10.8%

Financial Services

UC96.L
18.0%
S5EE.L
15.0%

Basic Materials

UC96.L
5.5%
S5EE.L
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

UC96.L
5.2%
S5EE.L
3.0%

Communication Services

UC96.L
4.1%
S5EE.L
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

UC96.L
4.0%
S5EE.L
4.4%

Energy

UC96.L
1.8%
S5EE.L

-

Utilities

UC96.L
0.4%
S5EE.L

-

Real Estate

UC96.L

-

S5EE.L
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC96.L vs. S5EE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC96.L
UC96.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
UC96.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC96.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC96.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
UC96.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC96.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

S5EE.L
S5EE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
S5EE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S5EE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
S5EE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
S5EE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
S5EE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC96.L vs. S5EE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) and UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UC96.LS5EE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.65

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

5.27

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.86

19.55

-8.69

UC96.L vs. S5EE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC96.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the S5EE.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC96.L and S5EE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UC96.L vs. S5EE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC96.L drawdown since its inception was -26.78%, roughly equal to the maximum S5EE.L drawdown of -28.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC96.L and S5EE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC96.LS5EE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.78%

-28.17%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.87%

-8.61%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-20.25%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.90%

-20.25%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.57%

+1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-8.65%

+4.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.32%

-0.23%

Volatility

UC96.L vs. S5EE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) is 2.63%, while UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that UC96.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than S5EE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC96.LS5EE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

5.41%

-2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.61%

9.97%

-2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.69%

12.67%

-1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.03%

14.94%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

19.22%

-3.50%

UC96.L vs. S5EE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC96.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than S5EE.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UC96.L vs. S5EE.L - Dividend Comparison

UC96.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while S5EE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
S5EE.L
UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC96.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.12%1.21%0.69%1.53%1.53%1.62%1.84%1.39%1.86%1.58%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


UC96.L and S5EE.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, S5EE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

S5EE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC96.L.

UC96.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while S5EE.L is S&P 500. UC96.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while S5EE.L tracks S&P 500 Elite ESG Index USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UC96.L and 0.15% for S5EE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC96.L and S5EE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer