PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UC79.L vs. SEDY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UC79.L vs. SEDY.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UC79.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and SEDY.L (iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from UBS and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UC79.L returned 10.59%/yr vs 8.20%/yr for SEDY.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UC79.L charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SEDY.L.

Performance

UC79.L vs. SEDY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC79.L achieves a 33.24% return, which is significantly higher than SEDY.L's 10.72% return. Over the past 10 years, UC79.L has outperformed SEDY.L with an annualized return of 10.59%, while SEDY.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.20% annualized return.

UC79.L

1D
-1.64%
1M
8.63%
YTD
33.24%
6M
35.28%
1Y
64.62%
3Y*
24.35%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*
10.59%

SEDY.L

1D
-0.38%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
10.72%
6M
10.19%
1Y
29.05%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
5.46%
10Y*
8.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC79.L vs. SEDY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UC79.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		33.24%26.95%10.88%1.14%-11.74%0.32%13.27%6.70%-5.60%20.39%
SEDY.L
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF		10.72%18.69%8.71%13.01%-22.64%12.64%-5.85%10.44%0.26%14.72%

Correlation

The correlation between UC79.L and SEDY.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2014

0.80

The correlation between UC79.L and SEDY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UC79.L vs. SEDY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
UC79.L
SEDY.L

Technology

38.0%
8.3%

Financial Services

22.6%
28.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
4.2%

Industrials

8.3%
17.3%

Communication Services

8.0%
1.6%

Healthcare

3.6%

-

Basic Materials

3.3%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
2.2%

Real Estate

1.3%
3.8%

Utilities

1.0%
7.2%

Energy

0.2%
18.2%

Technology

UC79.L
38.0%
SEDY.L
8.3%

Financial Services

UC79.L
22.6%
SEDY.L
28.6%

Consumer Cyclical

UC79.L
11.0%
SEDY.L
4.2%

Industrials

UC79.L
8.3%
SEDY.L
17.3%

Communication Services

UC79.L
8.0%
SEDY.L
1.6%

Healthcare

UC79.L
3.6%
SEDY.L

-

Basic Materials

UC79.L
3.3%
SEDY.L
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

UC79.L
2.8%
SEDY.L
2.2%

Real Estate

UC79.L
1.3%
SEDY.L
3.8%

Utilities

UC79.L
1.0%
SEDY.L
7.2%

Energy

UC79.L
0.2%
SEDY.L
18.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis

iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF

Often compared with UC79.L:
UC79.L vs. HMEF.LUC79.L vs. EMV.LUC79.L vs. COPPUC79.L vs. V3AB.LUC79.L vs. HDEM.LUC79.L vs. 5ESG.LUC79.L vs. EUFM.L
Often compared with SEDY.L:
SEDY.L vs. SEML.LSEDY.L vs. SCHDSEDY.L vs. IIND.LSEDY.L vs. CUKX.LSEDY.L vs. VHYG.LSEDY.L vs. IEMGSEDY.L vs. IDAP.L

Return for Risk

UC79.L vs. SEDY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UC79.L
UC79.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
UC79.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC79.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC79.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
UC79.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC79.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
SEDY.L
SEDY.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SEDY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEDY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEDY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SEDY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEDY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC79.L vs. SEDY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UC79.LSEDY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.44
2.53

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.27
3.51

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.45

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

5.95

-3.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.47

15.57

-11.11

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UC79.L vs. SEDY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC79.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the SEDY.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC79.L and SEDY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UC79.LSEDY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.53

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.37

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.51

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.29

-0.15

Drawdowns

UC79.L vs. SEDY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC79.L drawdown since its inception was -53.04%, which is greater than SEDY.L's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC79.L and SEDY.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UC79.LSEDY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.04%

-43.56%

-9.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.91%

-4.86%

-21.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.91%

-11.92%

-13.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.91%

-29.66%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.46%

-30.39%

-9.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-3.28%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.80%

-12.16%

-9.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.42%

1.86%

+12.56%

Volatility

UC79.L vs. SEDY.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L) has a higher volatility of 8.44% compared to iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L) at 4.19%. This indicates that UC79.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEDY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UC79.LSEDY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.44%

4.19%

+4.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.21%

9.07%

+6.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.59%

11.43%

+33.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.99%

14.75%

+10.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.01%

16.22%

+8.79%

UC79.L vs. SEDY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC79.L has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than SEDY.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

UC79.L vs. SEDY.L - Dividend Comparison

UC79.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than SEDY.L's 5.28% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEDY.L
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF		5.28%5.72%7.74%7.98%9.33%6.41%5.11%5.84%5.54%4.08%4.25%6.31%
UC79.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		1.59%2.14%1.79%2.38%2.06%1.35%1.81%2.11%2.11%1.97%2.15%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

UC79.L and SEDY.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UC79.L is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC79.L is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SEDY.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for UC79.L and 0.65% for SEDY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC79.L and SEDY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer