PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC67.L vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC67.L vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC67.L) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC67.L achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UC67.L having a 14.88% annualized return and VTI not far ahead at 15.04%.


UC67.L

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.59%
YTD
10.29%
6M
10.81%
1Y
27.25%
3Y*
22.02%
5Y*
13.21%
10Y*
14.88%

VTI

1D
0.47%
1M
4.59%
YTD
11.72%
6M
11.43%
1Y
28.79%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC67.L vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UC67.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
10.29%17.07%24.74%27.16%-20.11%27.17%20.28%30.31%-5.96%21.32%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.72%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between UC67.L and VTI is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2014

0.57

The correlation between UC67.L and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

UC67.L vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UC67.L
VTI

Technology

37.7%
33.5%

Financial Services

11.2%
12.0%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
10.0%

Healthcare

8.4%
9.2%

Industrials

8.1%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.7%

Energy

3.4%
3.7%

Utilities

2.1%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.0%

Technology

UC67.L
37.7%
VTI
33.5%

Financial Services

UC67.L
11.2%
VTI
12.0%

Communication Services

UC67.L
10.9%
VTI
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

UC67.L
9.9%
VTI
10.0%

Healthcare

UC67.L
8.4%
VTI
9.2%

Industrials

UC67.L
8.1%
VTI
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

UC67.L
4.7%
VTI
4.7%

Energy

UC67.L
3.4%
VTI
3.7%

Utilities

UC67.L
2.1%
VTI
2.3%

Real Estate

UC67.L
1.9%
VTI
2.4%

Basic Materials

UC67.L
1.7%
VTI
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC67.L vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC67.L
UC67.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
UC67.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC67.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC67.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
UC67.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC67.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC67.L vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC67.L) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UC67.LVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.24

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.61

14.94

-1.33

UC67.L vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC67.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC67.L and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UC67.LVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.38

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.74

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.82

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.51

+0.31

Drawdowns

UC67.L vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC67.L drawdown since its inception was -34.42%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC67.L and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC67.LVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.42%

-55.45%

+21.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.57%

-8.92%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.42%

-19.30%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.45%

-25.36%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.42%

-35.00%

+0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.26%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.46%

-8.03%

+3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.93%

+0.07%

Volatility

UC67.L vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC67.L) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.90%. This indicates that UC67.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC67.LVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

2.90%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

9.13%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.66%

12.17%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

17.40%

-1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

18.30%

-1.71%

UC67.L vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC67.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UC67.L vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

UC67.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UC67.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.58%0.62%0.76%0.89%1.04%0.75%1.01%1.14%1.25%0.58%1.26%1.28%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


UC67.L and VTI have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for UC67.L.

UC67.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for UC67.L and 0.03% for VTI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC67.L and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer