PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC67.L vs. FUQA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC67.L vs. FUQA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC67.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UC67.L is traded in USD, while FUQA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FUQA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC67.L achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than FUQA.L's 9.67% return.


UC67.L

1D
0.05%
1M
0.83%
6M
9.16%
YTD
10.26%
1Y
20.85%
3Y*
19.81%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
14.56%

FUQA.L

1D
-0.80%
1M
2.14%
6M
8.41%
YTD
9.67%
1Y
20.51%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC67.L vs. FUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UC67.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
10.26%17.07%24.74%27.16%-20.11%27.17%20.28%30.31%-5.96%15.77%
FUQA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
9.67%16.75%17.51%17.75%-10.69%26.66%11.54%32.33%-4.62%-7.43%

Correlation

The correlation between UC67.L and FUQA.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017

0.80

The correlation between UC67.L and FUQA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

UC67.L vs. FUQA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UC67.L
FUQA.L

Technology

37.9%
35.3%

Financial Services

11.4%
12.9%

Communication Services

9.8%
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
9.4%

Healthcare

9.0%
9.8%

Industrials

8.9%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.8%

Energy

3.1%
3.1%

Utilities

2.2%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.2%

Technology

UC67.L
37.9%
FUQA.L
35.3%

Financial Services

UC67.L
11.4%
FUQA.L
12.9%

Communication Services

UC67.L
9.8%
FUQA.L
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

UC67.L
9.6%
FUQA.L
9.4%

Healthcare

UC67.L
9.0%
FUQA.L
9.8%

Industrials

UC67.L
8.9%
FUQA.L
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

UC67.L
4.5%
FUQA.L
4.8%

Energy

UC67.L
3.1%
FUQA.L
3.1%

Utilities

UC67.L
2.2%
FUQA.L
2.1%

Real Estate

UC67.L
1.8%
FUQA.L
2.0%

Basic Materials

UC67.L
1.7%
FUQA.L
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC67.L vs. FUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC67.L
UC67.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
UC67.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC67.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC67.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
UC67.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC67.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FUQA.L
FUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC67.L vs. FUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC67.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UC67.LFUQA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.56

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.36

11.21

-0.85

UC67.L vs. FUQA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC67.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC67.L and FUQA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UC67.L vs. FUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC67.L drawdown since its inception was -34.42%, roughly equal to the maximum FUQA.L drawdown of -35.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC67.L and FUQA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC67.LFUQA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.42%

-35.38%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.57%

-7.97%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.42%

-19.14%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.45%

-20.19%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.80%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-6.76%

+2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.83%

+0.29%

Volatility

UC67.L vs. FUQA.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC67.L) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) at 2.57%. This indicates that UC67.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC67.LFUQA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

2.57%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.35%

7.54%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

10.04%

+2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.37%

19.97%

-3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.49%

22.99%

-6.50%

UC67.L vs. FUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC67.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FUQA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UC67.L vs. FUQA.L - Dividend Comparison

UC67.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while FUQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUQA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC67.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.58%0.62%0.76%0.89%1.04%0.75%1.01%1.14%1.25%0.58%1.26%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


UC67.L and FUQA.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UC67.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC67.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FUQA.L.

UC67.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FUQA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for UC67.L and 0.25% for FUQA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC67.L and FUQA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer