UC67.L vs. FUQA.L
UC67.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and FUQA.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - UC67.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while FUQA.L tracks the Fidelity US Quality Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UC67.L returned 12.32%/yr vs 11.82%/yr for FUQA.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UC67.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FUQA.L.
Performance
UC67.L vs. FUQA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UC67.L is traded in USD, while FUQA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FUQA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC67.L achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than FUQA.L's 9.67% return.
UC67.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 1Y
- 20.85%
- 3Y*
- 19.81%
- 5Y*
- 12.32%
- 10Y*
- 14.56%
FUQA.L
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- YTD
- 9.67%
- 1Y
- 20.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.63%
- 5Y*
- 11.82%
- 10Y*
- —
UC67.L vs. FUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC67.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 10.26% | 17.07% | 24.74% | 27.16% | -20.11% | 27.17% | 20.28% | 30.31% | -5.96% | 15.77% |
FUQA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc | 9.67% | 16.75% | 17.51% | 17.75% | -10.69% | 26.66% | 11.54% | 32.33% | -4.62% | -7.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between UC67.L and FUQA.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017 | 0.80 |
The correlation between UC67.L and FUQA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
UC67.L vs. FUQA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UC67.L
FUQA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
UC67.L
FUQA.L
Financial Services
UC67.L
FUQA.L
Communication Services
UC67.L
FUQA.L
Consumer Cyclical
UC67.L
FUQA.L
Healthcare
UC67.L
FUQA.L
Industrials
UC67.L
FUQA.L
Consumer Defensive
UC67.L
FUQA.L
Energy
UC67.L
FUQA.L
Utilities
UC67.L
FUQA.L
Real Estate
UC67.L
FUQA.L
Basic Materials
UC67.L
FUQA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UC67.L vs. FUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC67.L
FUQA.L
UC67.L vs. FUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC67.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UC67.L | FUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.37 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 2.56 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.36 | 11.21 | -0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UC67.L vs. FUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC67.L drawdown since its inception was -34.42%, roughly equal to the maximum FUQA.L drawdown of -35.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC67.L and FUQA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC67.L | FUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.42% | -35.38% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.57% | -7.97% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.42% | -19.14% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.45% | -20.19% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -0.80% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.41% | -6.76% | +2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 1.83% | +0.29% |
Volatility
UC67.L vs. FUQA.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC67.L) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) at 2.57%. This indicates that UC67.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UC67.L | FUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 2.57% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 7.54% | +1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 10.04% | +2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 19.97% | -3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 22.99% | -6.50% |
UC67.L vs. FUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC67.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FUQA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UC67.L vs. FUQA.L - Dividend Comparison
UC67.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while FUQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUQA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC67.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.58% | 0.62% | 0.76% | 0.89% | 1.04% | 0.75% | 1.01% | 1.14% | 1.25% | 0.58% | 1.26% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UC67.L and FUQA.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UC67.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UC67.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FUQA.L.
UC67.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FUQA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for UC67.L and 0.25% for FUQA.L.
Find the right allocation for UC67.L and FUQA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer