PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC55.L vs. WRDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC55.L vs. WRDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC55.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UC55.L having a 9.94% return and WRDA.L slightly higher at 10.16%.


UC55.L

1D
0.04%
1M
3.77%
YTD
9.94%
6M
9.79%
1Y
26.82%
3Y*
17.39%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*
13.61%

WRDA.L

1D
0.07%
1M
3.84%
YTD
10.16%
6M
9.93%
1Y
27.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC55.L vs. WRDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
UC55.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
9.94%12.47%19.37%
WRDA.L
UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.16%12.77%20.02%

Correlation

The correlation between UC55.L and WRDA.L is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024

0.99

The correlation between UC55.L and WRDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC55.L vs. WRDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC55.L
UC55.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
UC55.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC55.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC55.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
UC55.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC55.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

WRDA.L
WRDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC55.L vs. WRDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC55.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UC55.LWRDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.52

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

4.18

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.01

16.68

-0.67

UC55.L vs. WRDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC55.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC55.L and WRDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UC55.LWRDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.72

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

1.51

-0.68

Drawdowns

UC55.L vs. WRDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC55.L drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, which is greater than WRDA.L's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC55.L and WRDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC55.LWRDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.07%

-18.38%

-9.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

-6.53%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.12%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.35%

-2.27%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

1.64%

+0.04%

Volatility

UC55.L vs. WRDA.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC55.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) have volatilities of 2.50% and 2.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC55.LWRDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

2.49%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.22%

7.16%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.02%

10.03%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.29%

12.34%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.85%

12.34%

+2.51%

UC55.L vs. WRDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC55.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than WRDA.L's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

UC55.L vs. WRDA.L - Dividend Comparison

UC55.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while WRDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UC55.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.90%1.02%1.10%1.30%1.38%1.01%1.28%1.66%1.66%1.70%1.72%1.86%
WRDA.L
UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, UC55.L and WRDA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, WRDA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WRDA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for UC55.L.

UC55.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while WRDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for UC55.L and 0.06% for WRDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC55.L and WRDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer