UC46.L vs. XSNR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UC46.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and XSNR.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - UC46.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while XSNR.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UC46.L returned 15.32%/yr vs 12.04%/yr for XSNR.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UC46.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XSNR.L.

Performance

UC46.L vs. XSNR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC46.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC46.L achieves a 13.69% return, which is significantly higher than XSNR.L's 7.81% return. Over the past 10 years, UC46.L has outperformed XSNR.L with an annualized return of 15.32%, while XSNR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.04% annualized return.

UC46.L

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 8.42%
• YTD: 13.69%
• 6M: 12.83%
• 1Y: 26.84%
• 3Y*: 16.58%
• 5Y*: 12.52%
• 10Y*: 15.32%

XSNR.L

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -0.26%
• YTD: 7.81%
• 6M: 9.55%
• 1Y: 17.56%
• 3Y*: 14.21%
• 5Y*: 9.16%
• 10Y*: 12.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC46.L vs. XSNR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UC46.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	13.69%	2.79%	21.13%	25.01%	-16.49%	32.62%	18.59%	25.18%	0.87%	11.39%
XSNR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C	7.81%	20.64%	5.20%	21.57%	-14.54%	21.19%	12.17%	27.37%	-12.09%	21.42%

Correlation

The correlation between UC46.L and XSNR.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2013	0.67

The correlation between UC46.L and XSNR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UC46.L vs. XSNR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UC46.L	XSNR.L
Technology	44.2%	0.5%
Financial Services	12.0%	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	0.5%
Industrials	9.9%	97.5%
Healthcare	9.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	0.5%
Communication Services	3.6%	3.0%
Real Estate	2.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.6%	0.7%
Utilities	0.7%	-
Energy	-	0.3%

Return for Risk

UC46.L vs. XSNR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC46.L

UC46.L Risk / Return Rank: 62
UC46.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
UC46.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
UC46.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
UC46.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
UC46.L Martin Ratio Rank: 53

XSNR.L

XSNR.L Risk / Return Rank: 28
XSNR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
XSNR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
XSNR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 27
XSNR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
XSNR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC46.L vs. XSNR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC46.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UC46.L	XSNR.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	0.95	+1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	1.47	+1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.18	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	1.22	+1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.86	4.33	+4.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UC46.L vs. XSNR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC46.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the XSNR.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC46.L and XSNR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UC46.L	XSNR.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	0.95	+1.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.49	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	0.64	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.65	+0.27

Drawdowns

UC46.L vs. XSNR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC46.L drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, smaller than the maximum XSNR.L drawdown of -36.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC46.L and XSNR.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UC46.L	XSNR.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.03%	-36.07%	+11.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.80%	-14.30%	+4.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.59%	-17.10%	-5.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.06%	-27.20%	+4.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.03%	-36.07%	+11.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-3.35%	+2.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.64%	-6.09%	+1.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	4.05%	-1.03%

Volatility

UC46.L vs. XSNR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC46.L) is 3.91%, while Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) has a volatility of 6.25%. This indicates that UC46.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSNR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UC46.L	XSNR.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.91%	6.25%	-2.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.89%	15.20%	-6.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.11%	18.47%	-6.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.74%	18.87%	-3.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.29%	18.89%	-2.60%

UC46.L vs. XSNR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC46.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than XSNR.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UC46.L vs. XSNR.L - Dividend Comparison

UC46.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while XSNR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UC46.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	0.42%	0.80%	0.72%	0.75%	0.86%	0.64%	0.87%	1.03%	1.02%	1.23%	1.18%	1.24%
XSNR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UC46.L and XSNR.L in my portfolio?

UC46.L and XSNR.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UC46.L or XSNR.L?

On fees, XSNR.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UC46.L or XSNR.L?

XSNR.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for UC46.L.

What is the main difference between UC46.L and XSNR.L?

UC46.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XSNR.L is Industrials Equities. UC46.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while XSNR.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for UC46.L and 0.20% for XSNR.L.