UC15.L vs. UC48.L
UC15.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and UC48.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UC15.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI, while UC48.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UC15.L returned 12.77%/yr vs 8.57%/yr for UC48.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UC15.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for UC48.L.
Performance
UC15.L vs. UC48.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC15.L achieves a 21.49% return, which is significantly lower than UC48.L's 28.75% return.
UC15.L
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 21.49%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 32.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
UC48.L
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- 7.54%
- YTD
- 28.75%
- 6M
- 30.26%
- 1Y
- 55.93%
- 3Y*
- 21.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- —
UC15.L vs. UC48.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 21.49% | 2.57% | 6.44% | -6.52% | 29.97% | 36.11% | -2.49% | 5.31% | -5.25% | 9.42% |
UC48.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 28.75% | 23.58% | 13.94% | -1.31% | -10.09% | -4.06% | 20.65% | 13.67% | -10.64% | 8.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between UC15.L and UC48.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2017 | 0.27 |
The correlation between UC15.L and UC48.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UC15.L vs. UC48.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UC15.L
UC48.L
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
UC15.L
UC48.L
Communication Services
UC15.L
UC48.L
Energy
UC15.L
UC48.L
Financial Services
UC15.L
UC48.L
Healthcare
UC15.L
UC48.L
Consumer Cyclical
UC15.L
UC48.L
Industrials
UC15.L
UC48.L
Consumer Defensive
UC15.L
UC48.L
Utilities
UC15.L
UC48.L
Basic Materials
UC15.L
UC48.L
Real Estate
UC15.L
-
UC48.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UC15.L vs. UC48.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC15.L
UC48.L
UC15.L vs. UC48.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC48.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UC15.L | UC48.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.57 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.23 | 5.00 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.93 | 17.15 | -3.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UC15.L | UC48.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 3.17 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.50 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.47 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
UC15.L vs. UC48.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC15.L drawdown since its inception was -42.93%, which is greater than UC48.L's maximum drawdown of -32.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC15.L and UC48.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC15.L | UC48.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.93% | -32.18% | -10.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.18% | -11.13% | +4.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.98% | -17.18% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.43% | -27.26% | +9.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -2.73% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.17% | -11.41% | -3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 3.25% | -0.93% |
Volatility
UC15.L vs. UC48.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) is 5.07%, while UBS ETF (IE) MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC48.L) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that UC15.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC48.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UC15.L | UC48.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 7.80% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.34% | 14.76% | -2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | 17.62% | -2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 17.29% | -2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 18.09% | -3.29% |
UC15.L vs. UC48.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC15.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than UC48.L's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
UC15.L vs. UC48.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UC15.L nor UC48.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UC15.L and UC48.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UC48.L is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UC48.L is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UC15.L.
UC15.L is categorized as Commodities, while UC48.L is Asia Pacific Equities. UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI, while UC48.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UC15.L and 0.23% for UC48.L.
Find the right allocation for UC15.L and UC48.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer