PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC15.L vs. S600.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC15.L vs. S600.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) and Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (S600.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC15.L achieves a 21.49% return, which is significantly higher than S600.L's 6.62% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UC15.L having a 9.68% annualized return and S600.L not far ahead at 10.10%.


UC15.L

1D
-1.31%
1M
0.83%
YTD
21.49%
6M
20.94%
1Y
31.35%
3Y*
10.32%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*
9.68%

S600.L

1D
0.63%
1M
0.83%
YTD
6.62%
6M
8.86%
1Y
19.13%
3Y*
13.88%
5Y*
9.71%
10Y*
10.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC15.L vs. S600.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UC15.L
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
21.49%2.57%6.44%-6.52%29.97%36.11%-2.49%5.31%-5.25%-2.80%
S600.L
Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF
6.62%26.17%3.70%13.14%-4.95%16.44%3.69%20.15%-9.75%15.24%

Correlation

The correlation between UC15.L and S600.L is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014

0.25

The correlation between UC15.L and S600.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UC15.L vs. S600.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UC15.L
S600.L

Technology

31.0%
8.4%

Communication Services

15.0%
3.0%

Energy

14.2%
5.7%

Financial Services

10.9%
23.7%

Healthcare

9.8%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
6.8%

Industrials

6.6%
20.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
8.1%

Utilities

1.1%
4.9%

Basic Materials

0.5%
5.5%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Technology

UC15.L
31.0%
S600.L
8.4%

Communication Services

UC15.L
15.0%
S600.L
3.0%

Energy

UC15.L
14.2%
S600.L
5.7%

Financial Services

UC15.L
10.9%
S600.L
23.7%

Healthcare

UC15.L
9.8%
S600.L
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

UC15.L
7.3%
S600.L
6.8%

Industrials

UC15.L
6.6%
S600.L
20.2%

Consumer Defensive

UC15.L
3.7%
S600.L
8.1%

Utilities

UC15.L
1.1%
S600.L
4.9%

Basic Materials

UC15.L
0.5%
S600.L
5.5%

Real Estate

UC15.L

-

S600.L
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC15.L vs. S600.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC15.L
UC15.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
UC15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
UC15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

S600.L
S600.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
S600.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S600.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
S600.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
S600.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
S600.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC15.L vs. S600.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) and Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (S600.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UC15.LS600.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.30

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.23

1.82

+3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.93

6.60

+7.33

UC15.L vs. S600.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC15.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the S600.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC15.L and S600.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UC15.LS600.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.58

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.70

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.68

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.58

-0.24

Drawdowns

UC15.L vs. S600.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC15.L drawdown since its inception was -42.93%, which is greater than S600.L's maximum drawdown of -30.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC15.L and S600.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC15.LS600.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.93%

-30.21%

-12.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-10.47%

+4.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.98%

-12.53%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.43%

-17.04%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.26%

-30.21%

-0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.53%

-1.22%

-2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.17%

-4.30%

-10.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.90%

-0.58%

Volatility

UC15.L vs. S600.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (S600.L) at 4.05%. This indicates that UC15.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than S600.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC15.LS600.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

4.05%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

10.11%

+2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.26%

12.08%

+3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.69%

13.90%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.80%

14.86%

-0.06%

UC15.L vs. S600.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC15.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than S600.L's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

UC15.L vs. S600.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UC15.L nor S600.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UC15.L and S600.L have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, S600.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

S600.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UC15.L.

UC15.L is categorized as Commodities, while S600.L is Europe Equities. UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI, while S600.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UC15.L and 0.19% for S600.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC15.L and S600.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer