FCPVX vs. XSMO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO).
FCPVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004. XSMO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005.
Performance
FCPVX vs. XSMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCPVX vs. XSMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund | 1.90% | 8.13% | 9.41% | 17.77% | -13.07% | 38.08% | 11.18% | 20.86% | -15.47% | 12.26% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 7.05% | 9.80% | 17.45% | 21.55% | -15.44% | 19.24% | 21.96% | 28.65% | -3.44% | 23.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCPVX achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly lower than XSMO's 7.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FCPVX has underperformed XSMO with an annualized return of 9.75%, while XSMO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.73% annualized return.
FCPVX
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- -6.68%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 3.51%
- 1Y
- 16.60%
- 3Y*
- 11.68%
- 5Y*
- 6.62%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
XSMO
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- YTD
- 7.05%
- 6M
- 4.97%
- 1Y
- 23.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCPVX vs. XSMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCPVX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XSMO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCPVX vs. XSMO — Risk / Return Rank
FCPVX
XSMO
FCPVX vs. XSMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCPVX | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 1.07 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.23 | 1.59 | -0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.21 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 1.75 | -0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.30 | 7.23 | -2.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCPVX | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 1.07 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.38 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.57 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.36 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCPVX and XSMO is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCPVX vs. XSMO - Dividend Comparison
FCPVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.96%, more than XSMO's 0.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund | 9.96% | 10.15% | 6.13% | 5.20% | 5.92% | 7.95% | 0.46% | 3.49% | 36.44% | 3.64% | 7.12% | 11.09% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
Drawdowns
FCPVX vs. XSMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCPVX drawdown since its inception was -57.65%, roughly equal to the maximum XSMO drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPVX and XSMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCPVX | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.65% | -58.06% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.40% | -13.42% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.81% | -29.62% | +5.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.59% | -39.39% | -5.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.82% | -4.59% | -3.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -11.21% | +3.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 3.24% | +0.64% |
Volatility
FCPVX vs. XSMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) is 6.37%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that FCPVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCPVX | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.37% | 7.71% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.15% | 13.63% | -1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.94% | 22.11% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 22.87% | -2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 24.05% | -1.77% |