FCPVX vs. XSMO

In the year-to-date period, FCPVX achieves a -2.36% return, which is significantly lower than XSMO's 0.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FCPVX has underperformed XSMO with an annualized return of 2.20%, while XSMO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.75% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FCPVX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XSMO's 0.39% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FCPVX Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the XSMO Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCPVX and XSMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FCPVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than XSMO's 0.83% yield.

The maximum FCPVX drawdown since its inception was -58.43%, roughly equal to the maximum XSMO drawdown of -58.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPVX and XSMO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) at 6.08%. This indicates that FCPVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.