FCPVX vs. XSMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCPVX (Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund) and XSMO (Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF) are both funds - FCPVX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while XSMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index. Over the past 10 years, FCPVX returned 11.11%/yr vs 14.62%/yr for XSMO. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCPVX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for XSMO.

Performance

FCPVX vs. XSMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCPVX achieves a 19.20% return, which is significantly lower than XSMO's 21.96% return. Over the past 10 years, FCPVX has underperformed XSMO with an annualized return of 11.11%, while XSMO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.62% annualized return.

FCPVX

• 1D: 2.01%
• 1M: 4.33%
• YTD: 19.20%
• 6M: 16.77%
• 1Y: 34.79%
• 3Y*: 17.33%
• 5Y*: 8.24%
• 10Y*: 11.11%

XSMO

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: 21.96%
• 6M: 20.33%
• 1Y: 32.93%
• 3Y*: 24.51%
• 5Y*: 11.21%
• 10Y*: 14.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCPVX vs. XSMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCPVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund	19.20%	8.13%	9.41%	17.77%	-13.07%	38.08%	11.18%	20.86%	-15.47%	12.26%
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF	21.96%	9.80%	17.45%	21.55%	-15.44%	19.24%	21.96%	28.65%	-3.44%	23.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FCPVX and XSMO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2005	0.84

The correlation between FCPVX and XSMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCPVX vs. XSMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCPVX

FCPVX Risk / Return Rank: 59
FCPVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FCPVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FCPVX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FCPVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FCPVX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

XSMO

XSMO Risk / Return Rank: 58
XSMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
XSMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
XSMO Omega Ratio Rank: 47
XSMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
XSMO Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCPVX vs. XSMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCPVX	XSMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	1.77	+0.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	2.56	+0.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.30	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	3.72	-0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.74	12.71	+0.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCPVX vs. XSMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCPVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the XSMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCPVX and XSMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCPVX	XSMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	1.77	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.50	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.61	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.39	+0.08

Drawdowns

FCPVX vs. XSMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCPVX drawdown since its inception was -57.65%, roughly equal to the maximum XSMO drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPVX and XSMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCPVX	XSMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.65%	-58.06%	+0.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.31%	-8.89%	-1.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.81%	-24.76%	+0.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.81%	-29.62%	+5.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.59%	-39.39%	-5.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-1.72%	+1.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.97%	-11.13%	+3.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	2.60%	+0.35%

Volatility

FCPVX vs. XSMO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) have volatilities of 6.08% and 6.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCPVX	XSMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.08%	6.34%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.74%	14.11%	-1.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.86%	18.73%	-0.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.96%	22.67%	-1.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.36%	24.12%	-1.76%

FCPVX vs. XSMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCPVX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XSMO's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCPVX vs. XSMO - Dividend Comparison

FCPVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.52%, more than XSMO's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCPVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund	8.52%	10.15%	6.13%	5.20%	5.92%	7.95%	0.46%	3.49%	36.44%	3.64%	7.12%	11.09%
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF	0.53%	0.75%	0.63%	0.96%	1.19%	0.30%	0.82%	0.69%	0.66%	0.27%	0.30%	0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCPVX and XSMO in my portfolio?

FCPVX and XSMO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCPVX or XSMO?

XSMO has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to FCPVX (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCPVX dropped -57.65% vs XSMO's -58.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCPVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.