FCPVX vs. XSMO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO).
FCPVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004. XSMO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FCPVX or XSMO.
Correlation
The correlation between FCPVX and XSMO is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FCPVX vs. XSMO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FCPVX:
-0.86
XSMO:
-0.26
FCPVX:
-1.12
XSMO:
-0.22
FCPVX:
0.86
XSMO:
0.97
FCPVX:
-0.73
XSMO:
-0.25
FCPVX:
-2.67
XSMO:
-0.85
FCPVX:
6.77%
XSMO:
7.23%
FCPVX:
20.97%
XSMO:
23.31%
FCPVX:
-58.43%
XSMO:
-58.07%
FCPVX:
-24.91%
XSMO:
-24.76%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCPVX achieves a -17.68% return, which is significantly lower than XSMO's -16.31% return. Over the past 10 years, FCPVX has underperformed XSMO with an annualized return of 0.51%, while XSMO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.65% annualized return.
FCPVX
-17.68%
-13.87%
-18.19%
-18.44%
9.00%
0.51%
XSMO
-16.31%
-10.92%
-15.76%
-6.73%
12.89%
8.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCPVX vs. XSMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCPVX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XSMO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FCPVX vs. XSMO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FCPVX
XSMO
FCPVX vs. XSMO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FCPVX vs. XSMO - Dividend Comparison
FCPVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than XSMO's 1.00% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund | 0.73% | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 2.04% | 0.46% | 0.81% | 1.10% | 1.09% | 0.77% | 12.28% | 12.65% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 1.00% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.65% | 0.28% | 0.30% | 0.35% | 1.31% |
Drawdowns
FCPVX vs. XSMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCPVX drawdown since its inception was -58.43%, roughly equal to the maximum XSMO drawdown of -58.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPVX and XSMO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FCPVX vs. XSMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) is 9.95%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a volatility of 10.95%. This indicates that FCPVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.