UBVSX vs. ARSMX
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I (UBVSX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX).
UBVSX is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on Apr 30, 2013. ARSMX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Mar 29, 2007.
Performance
UBVSX vs. ARSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UBVSX vs. ARSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBVSX JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I | 2.90% | 1.70% | 13.03% | 14.59% | -1.26% | 34.05% | 3.35% | 23.11% | -15.37% | 13.26% |
ARSMX AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund | -1.68% | -0.83% | 12.42% | 14.48% | -8.62% | 23.41% | 1.71% | 34.82% | -6.44% | 15.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBVSX achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly higher than ARSMX's -1.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UBVSX having a 9.72% annualized return and ARSMX not far behind at 9.48%.
UBVSX
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 8.84%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
ARSMX
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 6M
- -4.87%
- 1Y
- 0.11%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UBVSX vs. ARSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBVSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than ARSMX's 1.27% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UBVSX vs. ARSMX — Risk / Return Rank
UBVSX
ARSMX
UBVSX vs. ARSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I (UBVSX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UBVSX | ARSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 0.04 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.74 | 0.18 | +0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.02 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | -0.07 | +0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.03 | -0.21 | +2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBVSX | ARSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 0.04 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.23 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.49 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.35 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between UBVSX and ARSMX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UBVSX vs. ARSMX - Dividend Comparison
UBVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.09%, while ARSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBVSX JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I | 9.09% | 9.35% | 7.36% | 8.30% | 8.89% | 3.34% | 0.90% | 4.85% | 11.46% | 4.53% | 3.11% | 3.69% |
ARSMX AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.27% | 3.89% | 4.85% | 5.86% | 0.00% | 3.60% | 8.60% | 15.66% | 8.03% | 17.82% |
Drawdowns
UBVSX vs. ARSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBVSX drawdown since its inception was -52.19%, roughly equal to the maximum ARSMX drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBVSX and ARSMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBVSX | ARSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.19% | -51.75% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.53% | -12.25% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.48% | -19.34% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.19% | -42.96% | -9.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.27% | -9.05% | +2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.32% | -8.12% | +1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.48% | 4.07% | +0.41% |
Volatility
UBVSX vs. ARSMX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I (UBVSX) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX) at 4.00%. This indicates that UBVSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UBVSX | ARSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 4.00% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | 11.20% | +0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.80% | 18.48% | +3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 17.88% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 19.60% | +5.00% |