PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBVLX vs. NSDVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBVLX vs. NSDVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund (UBVLX) and North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBVLX achieves a 15.58% return, which is significantly lower than NSDVX's 23.69% return. Over the past 10 years, UBVLX has outperformed NSDVX with an annualized return of 10.67%, while NSDVX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.25% annualized return.


UBVLX

1D
1.22%
1M
1.03%
6M
9.95%
YTD
15.58%
1Y
19.80%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
10.67%
ALL TIME*
11.76%

NSDVX

1D
1.32%
1M
1.40%
6M
13.87%
YTD
23.69%
1Y
27.59%
3Y*
11.34%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
7.25%
ALL TIME*
8.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

UBVLX vs. NSDVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBVLX
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund
15.58%1.79%13.11%14.69%-1.16%34.25%3.52%23.27%-15.23%13.43%
NSDVX
North Star Dividend Fund
23.69%-1.31%9.25%8.06%-6.36%16.16%6.51%16.13%-12.35%8.27%

Correlation

The correlation between UBVLX and NSDVX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2013

0.82

The correlation between UBVLX and NSDVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBVLX vs. NSDVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UBVLX
UBVLX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
UBVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
UBVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

NSDVX
NSDVX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NSDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NSDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UBVLX vs. NSDVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund (UBVLX) and North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UBVLXNSDVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.37

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

2.92

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

8.72

-2.75

UBVLX vs. NSDVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBVLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the NSDVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBVLX and NSDVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UBVLX vs. NSDVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBVLX drawdown since its inception was -67.24%, which is greater than NSDVX's maximum drawdown of -38.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBVLX and NSDVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBVLXNSDVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.24%

-38.64%

-28.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-10.48%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.46%

-16.41%

-5.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.46%

-21.27%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.08%

-38.64%

-13.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-0.92%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.22%

-6.47%

-2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

3.50%

+0.11%

Volatility

UBVLX vs. NSDVX - Volatility Comparison

Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund (UBVLX) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) at 3.94%. This indicates that UBVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSDVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBVLXNSDVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

3.94%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.25%

9.60%

+1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.51%

14.64%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.11%

16.03%

+4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.58%

17.76%

+6.82%

UBVLX vs. NSDVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBVLX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than NSDVX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBVLX vs. NSDVX - Dividend Comparison

UBVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, more than NSDVX's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NSDVX
North Star Dividend Fund
2.72%3.45%7.00%2.52%6.57%3.31%1.52%2.64%6.87%2.48%4.67%3.51%
UBVLX
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund
8.14%9.41%7.39%8.35%8.96%3.44%0.99%4.98%11.62%4.67%3.24%3.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBVLX and NSDVX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UBVLX has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to NSDVX (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBVLX dropped -67.24% vs NSDVX's -38.64%.

NSDVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBVLX and NSDVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer