PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBVFX vs. FBLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBVFX vs. FBLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class R6 (UBVFX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBVFX achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than FBLEX's 8.36% return. Over the past 10 years, UBVFX has underperformed FBLEX with an annualized return of 10.14%, while FBLEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.89% annualized return.


UBVFX

1D
0.55%
1M
2.19%
YTD
7.56%
6M
8.55%
1Y
14.91%
3Y*
12.94%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
10.14%

FBLEX

1D
0.33%
1M
2.07%
YTD
8.36%
6M
9.82%
1Y
22.33%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBVFX vs. FBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBVFX
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class R6
7.56%1.89%13.22%14.81%-1.08%34.40%3.60%23.42%-15.16%13.53%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
8.36%17.06%18.04%15.60%-4.82%26.83%4.34%25.57%-9.04%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between UBVFX and FBLEX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.88

The correlation between UBVFX and FBLEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBVFX vs. FBLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBVFX
UBVFX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
UBVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
UBVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLEX
FBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBVFX vs. FBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class R6 (UBVFX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBVFXFBLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.40

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

3.35

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.50

13.56

-9.06

UBVFX vs. FBLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBVFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the FBLEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBVFX and FBLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBVFXFBLEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

2.20

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.78

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.69

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.73

-0.31

Drawdowns

UBVFX vs. FBLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBVFX drawdown since its inception was -52.01%, which is greater than FBLEX's maximum drawdown of -39.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBVFX and FBLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBVFXFBLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.01%

-39.73%

-12.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.31%

-6.89%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.44%

-14.71%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.44%

-19.00%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.01%

-39.73%

-12.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-0.20%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-3.83%

-2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

1.70%

+2.00%

Volatility

UBVFX vs. FBLEX - Volatility Comparison

Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class R6 (UBVFX) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) at 2.69%. This indicates that UBVFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBVFXFBLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

2.69%

+1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

7.89%

+2.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.70%

10.50%

+6.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.33%

14.79%

+5.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.61%

17.40%

+7.21%

UBVFX vs. FBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBVFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLEX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBVFX vs. FBLEX - Dividend Comparison

UBVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.83%, less than FBLEX's 10.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
10.25%9.95%12.63%5.05%12.66%14.51%3.85%5.65%10.97%7.09%2.47%13.81%
UBVFX
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class R6
8.83%9.49%7.47%8.43%9.05%3.53%1.08%5.07%11.74%4.75%3.31%3.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBVFX and FBLEX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UBVFX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to FBLEX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBVFX dropped -52.01% vs FBLEX's -39.73%.

FBLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBVFX and FBLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer