UBUD.DE vs. BCFU.DE
UBUD.DE (UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist) and BCFU.DE (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UBUD.DE is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners, while BCFU.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UBUD.DE returned 23.10%/yr vs 11.97%/yr for BCFU.DE. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UBUD.DE charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for BCFU.DE.
Performance
UBUD.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UBUD.DE is traded in EUR, while BCFU.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BCFU.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBUD.DE achieves a -18.54% return, which is significantly lower than BCFU.DE's 17.88% return.
UBUD.DE
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -13.92%
- 6M
- -25.14%
- YTD
- -18.54%
- 1Y
- 41.04%
- 3Y*
- 38.37%
- 5Y*
- 23.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.71%
BCFU.DE
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- 6M
- 14.48%
- YTD
- 17.88%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 11.63%
- 5Y*
- 11.97%
- 10Y*
- —
UBUD.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBUD.DE UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist | -18.54% | 144.78% | 34.71% | 5.73% | 0.21% | -8.24% | 15.80% | 40.50% | -5.79% | 1.17% |
BCFU.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 17.88% | 5.81% | 11.23% | -8.44% | 23.73% | 43.46% | -7.90% | 9.34% | 3.41% | -8.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBUD.DE and BCFU.DE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017 | 0.21 |
The correlation between UBUD.DE and BCFU.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBUD.DE vs. BCFU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UBUD.DE
BCFU.DE
UBUD.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) and UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UBUD.DE | BCFU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.33 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 3.06 | -1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.58 | 9.28 | -6.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UBUD.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBUD.DE drawdown since its inception was -71.17%, which is greater than BCFU.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBUD.DE and BCFU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBUD.DE | BCFU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.17% | -25.13% | -46.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.64% | -9.33% | -27.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.64% | -13.93% | -22.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.20% | -25.13% | -13.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.64% | -4.45% | -32.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.24% | -10.93% | -26.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.88% | 3.08% | +12.80% |
Volatility
UBUD.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.28% compared to UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) at 3.29%. This indicates that UBUD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCFU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBUD.DE | BCFU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.28% | 3.29% | +10.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.61% | 12.57% | +26.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.37% | 15.05% | +33.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.49% | 16.89% | +19.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.12% | 16.44% | +20.68% |
UBUD.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBUD.DE has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than BCFU.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
UBUD.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Dividend Comparison
UBUD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while BCFU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFU.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UBUD.DE UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist | 0.80% | 0.44% | 0.61% | 1.13% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 0.50% | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.54% | 0.47% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBUD.DE and BCFU.DE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCFU.DE is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCFU.DE is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for UBUD.DE.
UBUD.DE is categorized as Gold, while BCFU.DE is Commodities. UBUD.DE tracks Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners, while BCFU.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for UBUD.DE and 0.34% for BCFU.DE.
Find the right allocation for UBUD.DE and BCFU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer