PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBUD.DE vs. AW1C.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBUD.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBUD.DE achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than AW1C.DE's 21.11% return.


UBUD.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
-3.95%
YTD
-6.38%
6M
0.94%
1Y
47.84%
3Y*
42.44%
5Y*
24.10%
10Y*
14.59%

AW1C.DE

1D
-0.12%
1M
11.53%
YTD
21.11%
6M
23.44%
1Y
39.49%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
15.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBUD.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UBUD.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist
-6.38%144.52%34.69%6.34%0.11%-0.66%
AW1C.DE
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
21.11%6.94%24.89%24.93%-14.50%30.17%

Correlation

The correlation between UBUD.DE and AW1C.DE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2021

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBUD.DE vs. AW1C.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBUD.DE
UBUD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
UBUD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

AW1C.DE
AW1C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
AW1C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AW1C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
AW1C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AW1C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
AW1C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBUD.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBUD.DEAW1C.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.48

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

2.33

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.06

4.43

-0.37

UBUD.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBUD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the AW1C.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBUD.DE and AW1C.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBUD.DEAW1C.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

1.56

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.85

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.92

-0.65

Drawdowns

UBUD.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBUD.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.79%, which is greater than AW1C.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBUD.DE and AW1C.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBUD.DEAW1C.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.79%

-22.40%

-35.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.94%

-16.86%

-12.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.94%

-22.40%

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.21%

-22.40%

-15.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.15%

-0.12%

-27.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.07%

-5.82%

-22.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.75%

8.90%

+2.85%

Volatility

UBUD.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) at 3.81%. This indicates that UBUD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AW1C.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBUD.DEAW1C.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.71%

3.81%

+9.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.92%

9.14%

+26.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.63%

25.24%

+20.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.68%

18.35%

+17.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.58%

18.11%

+17.47%

UBUD.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBUD.DE has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than AW1C.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBUD.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Dividend Comparison

UBUD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while AW1C.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AW1C.DE
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UBUD.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist
0.59%0.40%0.56%1.74%1.12%1.15%0.44%0.42%0.48%0.46%0.43%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBUD.DE and AW1C.DE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AW1C.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AW1C.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for UBUD.DE.

UBUD.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while AW1C.DE is S&P 500. UBUD.DE tracks Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners, while AW1C.DE tracks S&P 500® ESG Elite. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for UBUD.DE and 0.15% for AW1C.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBUD.DE and AW1C.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer