UBRL vs. DLLL
UBRL (GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF) and DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. UBRL is actively managed, while DLLL is passively managed. Over the past year, UBRL returned -37.28% vs 850.63% for DLLL. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UBRL charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DLLL.
Performance
UBRL vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBRL achieves a -28.65% return, which is significantly lower than DLLL's 757.76% return.
UBRL
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -7.56%
- YTD
- -28.65%
- 6M
- -42.96%
- 1Y
- -37.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLLL
- 1D
- -6.45%
- 1M
- 245.92%
- YTD
- 757.76%
- 6M
- 648.38%
- 1Y
- 850.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UBRL vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UBRL GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF | -28.65% | -14.18% |
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 757.76% | -3.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBRL and DLLL is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | 0.27 |
The correlation between UBRL and DLLL shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBRL vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank
UBRL
DLLL
UBRL vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF (UBRL) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UBRL | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.60 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 15.02 | -15.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | 31.34 | -32.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBRL | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 | 6.65 | -7.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.27 | 3.16 | -3.42 |
Drawdowns
UBRL vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBRL drawdown since its inception was -56.25%, smaller than the maximum DLLL drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBRL and DLLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBRL | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.25% | -68.58% | +12.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.25% | -57.19% | +0.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.48% | -18.86% | -35.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.34% | -25.91% | -2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.27% | 27.36% | +5.91% |
Volatility
UBRL vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF (UBRL) is 23.03%, while GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a volatility of 69.39%. This indicates that UBRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DLLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBRL | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.03% | 69.39% | -46.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.39% | 102.08% | -53.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.91% | 129.28% | -64.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.97% | 130.55% | -54.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.97% | 130.55% | -54.58% |
UBRL vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBRL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DLLL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UBRL vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison
UBRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.64%, while DLLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UBRL GraniteShares 2x Long UBER Daily ETF | 14.64% | 10.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBRL and DLLL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DLLL has higher volatility (69.39%) compared to UBRL (23.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBRL dropped -56.25% vs DLLL's -68.58%.
On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 850.63% vs -37.28% for UBRL. On fees, UBRL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, UBRL has been the lower-risk option at 23.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 850.63% return vs -37.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UBRL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.
UBRL has the higher dividend yield at 14.64%, compared with 0.00% for DLLL.
Their fees differ too: 1.15% for UBRL and 1.50% for DLLL.
DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.65 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UBRL and DLLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer