UBR vs. PYPG
UBR (ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil) and PYPG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UBR is passively managed, while PYPG is actively managed. Over the past year, UBR returned 60.74% vs -56.05% for PYPG. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UBR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PYPG.
Performance
UBR vs. PYPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBR achieves a 18.82% return, which is significantly higher than PYPG's -23.41% return.
UBR
- 1D
- -2.68%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- 6M
- 8.28%
- YTD
- 18.82%
- 1Y
- 60.74%
- 3Y*
- 5.55%
- 5Y*
- -2.40%
- 10Y*
- -4.82%
PYPG
- 1D
- 4.02%
- 1M
- 61.13%
- 6M
- -18.36%
- YTD
- -23.41%
- 1Y
- -56.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UBR vs. PYPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UBR ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil | 18.82% | 48.12% |
PYPG Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF | -23.41% | -20.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBR and PYPG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBR vs. PYPG — Risk / Return Rank
UBR
PYPG
UBR vs. PYPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil (UBR) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF (PYPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UBR | PYPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.91 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | -0.71 | +2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.23 | -1.00 | +5.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UBR vs. PYPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBR drawdown since its inception was -97.15%, which is greater than PYPG's maximum drawdown of -79.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBR and PYPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBR | PYPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.15% | -79.52% | -17.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.75% | -79.52% | +43.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.47% | -61.72% | -30.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.99% | -41.31% | -36.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.39% | 56.30% | -41.91% |
Volatility
UBR vs. PYPG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil (UBR) is 11.76%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF (PYPG) has a volatility of 34.53%. This indicates that UBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBR | PYPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.76% | 34.53% | -22.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.85% | 77.11% | -37.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.94% | 85.35% | -35.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.52% | 83.28% | -27.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.28% | 83.28% | -17.00% |
UBR vs. PYPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PYPG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UBR vs. PYPG - Dividend Comparison
UBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, while PYPG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYPG Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UBR ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil | 1.65% | 2.05% | 8.09% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.53% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBR and PYPG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PYPG has higher volatility (34.53%) compared to UBR (11.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBR dropped -97.15% vs PYPG's -79.52%.
On 1-year performance, UBR leads with 60.74% vs -56.05% for PYPG. On fees, PYPG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UBR has been the lower-risk option at 11.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UBR has performed better with a 60.74% return vs -56.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PYPG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UBR.
UBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.00% for PYPG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UBR and 0.75% for PYPG.
UBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UBR and PYPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer