UBPIX vs. FNPIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UBPIX (ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund) and FNPIX (ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, UBPIX returned 6.93%/yr vs 13.42%/yr for FNPIX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UBPIX charges 1.73%/yr vs 1.72%/yr for FNPIX.

Performance

UBPIX vs. FNPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund (UBPIX) and ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBPIX achieves a 38.74% return, which is significantly higher than FNPIX's -10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, UBPIX has underperformed FNPIX with an annualized return of 6.93%, while FNPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.42% annualized return.

UBPIX

• 1D: 1.94%
• 1M: -6.81%
• YTD: 38.74%
• 6M: 35.97%
• 1Y: 101.88%
• 3Y*: 28.71%
• 5Y*: 13.01%
• 10Y*: 6.93%

FNPIX

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.71%
• YTD: -10.35%
• 6M: -7.10%
• 1Y: -1.81%
• 3Y*: 20.57%
• 5Y*: 8.17%
• 10Y*: 13.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBPIX vs. FNPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UBPIX ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund	38.74%	88.27%	-39.96%	53.61%	9.98%	-10.66%	-50.10%	13.18%	-22.18%	46.59%
FNPIX ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund	-10.35%	16.39%	38.51%	18.34%	-23.84%	57.11%	-9.83%	46.49%	-17.23%	27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between UBPIX and FNPIX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2007	0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between UBPIX and FNPIX has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

UBPIX vs. FNPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBPIX

UBPIX Risk / Return Rank: 70
UBPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
UBPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
UBPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
UBPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
UBPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

FNPIX

FNPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2
FNPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FNPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FNPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FNPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FNPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBPIX vs. FNPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund (UBPIX) and ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UBPIX	FNPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	-0.07	+2.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	0.04	+2.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.01	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.16	-0.07	+5.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.22	-0.18	+15.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UBPIX vs. FNPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the FNPIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBPIX and FNPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UBPIX	FNPIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.62	-0.07	+2.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.30	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12	0.44	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.15	0.10	-0.25

Drawdowns

UBPIX vs. FNPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBPIX drawdown since its inception was -98.57%, which is greater than FNPIX's maximum drawdown of -93.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBPIX and FNPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	UBPIX	FNPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.57%	-93.14%	-5.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.34%	-22.37%	+2.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.74%	-23.21%	-21.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.18%	-37.80%	-11.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.02%	-58.23%	-30.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.79%	-14.16%	-75.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-84.70%	-36.22%	-48.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.88%	8.95%	-2.07%

Volatility

UBPIX vs. FNPIX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund (UBPIX) has a higher volatility of 11.36% compared to ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) at 4.59%. This indicates that UBPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UBPIX	FNPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.36%	4.59%	+6.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.50%	16.23%	+17.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.04%	21.37%	+18.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.98%	27.36%	+18.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.05%	30.65%	+25.40%

UBPIX vs. FNPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBPIX has a 1.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FNPIX's 1.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

UBPIX vs. FNPIX - Dividend Comparison

UBPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, while FNPIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNPIX ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.49%	0.25%	0.00%	13.10%	0.00%	1.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UBPIX ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund	3.63%	5.03%	6.94%	4.32%	10.96%	6.00%	0.53%	1.28%	1.58%	0.22%	0.32%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UBPIX and FNPIX in my portfolio?

UBPIX and FNPIX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UBPIX or FNPIX?

UBPIX has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to FNPIX (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBPIX dropped -98.57% vs FNPIX's -93.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UBPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.