PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBPIX vs. ENPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBPIX vs. ENPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund (UBPIX) and ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBPIX achieves a 38.74% return, which is significantly lower than ENPIX's 44.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UBPIX having a 6.93% annualized return and ENPIX not far ahead at 7.16%.


UBPIX

1D
1.94%
1M
-6.81%
YTD
38.74%
6M
35.97%
1Y
101.88%
3Y*
28.71%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
6.93%

ENPIX

1D
1.64%
1M
-4.27%
YTD
44.87%
6M
40.54%
1Y
61.49%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
23.64%
10Y*
7.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBPIX vs. ENPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBPIX
ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund
38.74%88.27%-39.96%53.61%9.98%-10.66%-50.10%13.18%-22.18%46.59%
ENPIX
ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund
44.87%4.99%2.30%-7.46%92.17%82.32%-53.71%10.35%-30.54%-5.59%

Correlation

The correlation between UBPIX and ENPIX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2007

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between UBPIX and ENPIX has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBPIX vs. ENPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBPIX
UBPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UBPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UBPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ENPIX
ENPIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ENPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ENPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBPIX vs. ENPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund (UBPIX) and ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBPIXENPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.32

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.16

3.59

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.22

10.06

+5.16

UBPIX vs. ENPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the ENPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBPIX and ENPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBPIXENPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.10

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.61

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

0.16

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.15

0.12

-0.27

Drawdowns

UBPIX vs. ENPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBPIX drawdown since its inception was -98.57%, which is greater than ENPIX's maximum drawdown of -90.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBPIX and ENPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBPIXENPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.57%

-90.12%

-8.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.34%

-17.99%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.74%

-32.27%

-12.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.18%

-36.48%

-12.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.02%

-84.54%

-4.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.79%

-12.11%

-77.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.70%

-36.91%

-47.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.88%

6.41%

+0.47%

Volatility

UBPIX vs. ENPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund (UBPIX) is 11.36%, while ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX) has a volatility of 12.17%. This indicates that UBPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBPIXENPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.36%

12.17%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.50%

24.79%

+8.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.04%

30.75%

+9.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.98%

38.78%

+7.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.05%

44.71%

+11.34%

UBPIX vs. ENPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBPIX has a 1.73% expense ratio, which is higher than ENPIX's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBPIX vs. ENPIX - Dividend Comparison

UBPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than ENPIX's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENPIX
ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund
1.91%2.76%3.19%0.87%2.76%1.59%1.76%1.34%1.76%0.84%0.57%0.56%
UBPIX
ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund
3.63%5.03%6.94%4.32%10.96%6.00%0.53%1.28%1.58%0.22%0.32%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBPIX and ENPIX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENPIX has higher volatility (12.17%) compared to UBPIX (11.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBPIX dropped -98.57% vs ENPIX's -90.12%.

UBPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBPIX and ENPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer