UBOT vs. THNQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UBOT (Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares) and THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UBOT is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index (300%), while THNQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UBOT returned -6.34%/yr vs 17.90%/yr for THNQ. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UBOT charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for THNQ.

Performance

UBOT vs. THNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBOT achieves a 16.93% return, which is significantly lower than THNQ's 44.05% return.

UBOT

• 1D: -1.65%
• 1M: 9.27%
• YTD: 16.93%
• 6M: 21.77%
• 1Y: 49.20%
• 3Y*: 12.40%
• 5Y*: -6.34%
• 10Y*: —

THNQ

• 1D: -2.20%
• 1M: 22.90%
• YTD: 44.05%
• 6M: 40.99%
• 1Y: 79.25%
• 3Y*: 37.91%
• 5Y*: 17.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBOT vs. THNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
UBOT Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares	16.93%	13.42%	12.02%	72.59%	-72.45%	9.78%	186.23%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	44.05%	29.83%	18.82%	56.81%	-39.84%	9.10%	58.41%

Correlation

The correlation between UBOT and THNQ is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020	0.82

The correlation between UBOT and THNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

UBOT vs. THNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UBOT	THNQ
Industrials	48.6%	1.1%
Technology	31.8%	71.6%
Healthcare	9.0%	5.6%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	9.2%
Communication Services	4.5%	10.3%
Financial Services	0.9%	1.3%
Energy	0.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	0.0%	-
Utilities	0.0%	-
Real Estate	-	0.9%

Return for Risk

UBOT vs. THNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBOT

UBOT Risk / Return Rank: 29
UBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
UBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
UBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 28
UBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
UBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 30

THNQ

THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 80
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 76
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBOT vs. THNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UBOT	THNQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	3.01	-1.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	3.58	-1.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.46	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	4.33	-2.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.39	14.31	-9.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UBOT vs. THNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the THNQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBOT and THNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UBOT	THNQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	3.01	-1.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.12	0.62	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	0.83	-0.88

Drawdowns

UBOT vs. THNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBOT drawdown since its inception was -86.01%, which is greater than THNQ's maximum drawdown of -50.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBOT and THNQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	UBOT	THNQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.01%	-50.56%	-35.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.90%	-18.39%	-17.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.64%	-29.88%	-21.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-82.90%	-50.56%	-32.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.38%	-2.20%	-41.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.53%	-15.07%	-34.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.24%	5.56%	+5.68%

Volatility

UBOT vs. THNQ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) has a higher volatility of 15.45% compared to ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) at 8.50%. This indicates that UBOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UBOT	THNQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.45%	8.50%	+6.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.47%	20.69%	+15.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.78%	26.47%	+21.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.94%	29.09%	+23.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.46%	28.66%	+34.80%

UBOT vs. THNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBOT has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than THNQ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

UBOT vs. THNQ - Dividend Comparison

UBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than THNQ's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.14%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UBOT Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares	0.80%	0.78%	1.45%	0.65%	0.00%	2.25%	15.83%	0.55%	0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UBOT and THNQ in my portfolio?

UBOT and THNQ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UBOT or THNQ?

UBOT has higher volatility (15.45%) compared to THNQ (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBOT dropped -86.01% vs THNQ's -50.56%.

Which ETF is better, UBOT or THNQ?

On 5-year performance, THNQ leads with 17.90% vs -6.34% for UBOT. On fees, THNQ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, THNQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UBOT or THNQ?

Over the 5-year period, THNQ has performed better with a 17.90% return vs -6.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UBOT or THNQ?

THNQ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for UBOT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UBOT or THNQ?

UBOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.14% for THNQ.

What is the main difference between UBOT and THNQ?

UBOT is categorized as Robotics, while THNQ is Technology Equities. UBOT tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index (300%), while THNQ tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for UBOT and 0.68% for THNQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.