UBOT vs. RETL
UBOT (Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares) and RETL (Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - UBOT is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index (300%), while RETL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UBOT returned -10.84%/yr vs -26.39%/yr for RETL. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UBOT charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for RETL.
Performance
UBOT vs. RETL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBOT achieves a -14.56% return, which is significantly lower than RETL's 0.69% return.
UBOT
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -18.55%
- 6M
- -18.05%
- YTD
- -14.56%
- 1Y
- -1.35%
- 3Y*
- -0.24%
- 5Y*
- -10.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -7.19%
RETL
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 6.66%
- 6M
- -9.95%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 8.84%
- 3Y*
- 7.18%
- 5Y*
- -26.39%
- 10Y*
- -5.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.64%
UBOT vs. RETL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBOT Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares | -14.56% | 13.42% | 12.02% | 72.59% | -72.45% | 9.78% | 80.13% | 87.34% | -71.74% |
RETL Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares | 0.69% | -5.98% | 9.59% | 33.62% | -80.80% | 101.03% | 63.63% | 23.41% | -31.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBOT and RETL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2018 | 0.60 |
The correlation between UBOT and RETL shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UBOT vs. RETL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UBOT
RETL
Industrials
-
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
UBOT
RETL
-
Technology
UBOT
RETL
Healthcare
UBOT
RETL
Consumer Cyclical
UBOT
RETL
Communication Services
UBOT
RETL
Financial Services
UBOT
RETL
-
Energy
UBOT
RETL
Consumer Defensive
UBOT
RETL
Basic Materials
UBOT
RETL
-
Utilities
UBOT
RETL
-
Real Estate
UBOT
-
RETL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBOT vs. RETL — Risk / Return Rank
UBOT
RETL
UBOT vs. RETL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) and Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UBOT | RETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.07 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 0.23 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | 0.46 | -0.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UBOT vs. RETL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBOT drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, smaller than the maximum RETL drawdown of -92.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBOT and RETL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBOT | RETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.24% | -92.00% | +5.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.90% | -38.08% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.64% | -62.72% | +11.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.90% | -92.00% | +9.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.63% | -82.71% | +24.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.86% | -37.90% | -11.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.95% | 19.41% | -5.46% |
Volatility
UBOT vs. RETL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) has a higher volatility of 19.42% compared to Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) at 14.91%. This indicates that UBOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RETL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBOT | RETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.42% | 14.91% | +4.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.46% | 43.05% | -0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.53% | 61.10% | -8.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.88% | 79.29% | -25.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.57% | 79.96% | -16.39% |
UBOT vs. RETL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBOT has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than RETL's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
UBOT vs. RETL - Dividend Comparison
UBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than RETL's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RETL Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares | 0.50% | 0.58% | 1.13% | 1.35% | 0.71% | 0.22% | 0.19% | 0.92% | 1.19% | 0.01% | 2.60% |
UBOT Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares | 1.15% | 0.78% | 1.45% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 2.25% | 15.83% | 0.55% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBOT and RETL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UBOT has higher volatility (19.42%) compared to RETL (14.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBOT dropped -86.24% vs RETL's -92.00%.
On 5-year performance, UBOT leads with -10.84% vs -26.39% for RETL. On fees, RETL is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, RETL has been the lower-risk option at 14.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UBOT has performed better with a -10.84% return vs -26.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RETL is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for UBOT.
UBOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.50% for RETL.
UBOT is categorized as Robotics, while RETL is Leveraged Equities. UBOT tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index (300%), while RETL tracks Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.29% for UBOT and 0.99% for RETL.
RETL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UBOT and RETL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer