PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBOT vs. RETL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBOT vs. RETL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) and Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBOT achieves a -1.41% return, which is significantly lower than RETL's -0.70% return.


UBOT

1D
-0.59%
1M
-21.50%
YTD
-1.41%
6M
-1.92%
1Y
24.92%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
-9.40%
10Y*

RETL

1D
0.11%
1M
30.06%
YTD
-0.70%
6M
-9.36%
1Y
19.94%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
-27.38%
10Y*
-3.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBOT vs. RETL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UBOT
Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares
-1.41%13.42%12.02%72.59%-72.45%9.78%80.13%87.34%-71.74%
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
-0.70%-5.98%9.59%33.62%-80.80%101.03%63.63%23.41%-31.87%

Correlation

The correlation between UBOT and RETL is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2018

0.61

The correlation between UBOT and RETL shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UBOT vs. RETL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UBOT
RETL

Industrials

48.6%

-

Technology

31.8%
0.3%

Healthcare

9.0%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
14.0%

Communication Services

4.5%
0.3%

Financial Services

0.9%

-

Energy

0.5%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
3.9%

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Utilities

0.0%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

UBOT
48.6%
RETL

-

Technology

UBOT
31.8%
RETL
0.3%

Healthcare

UBOT
9.0%
RETL
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

UBOT
6.1%
RETL
14.0%

Communication Services

UBOT
4.5%
RETL
0.3%

Financial Services

UBOT
0.9%
RETL

-

Energy

UBOT
0.5%
RETL
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

UBOT
0.0%
RETL
3.9%

Basic Materials

UBOT
0.0%
RETL

-

Utilities

UBOT
0.0%
RETL

-

Real Estate

UBOT

-

RETL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBOT vs. RETL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBOT
UBOT Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
UBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
UBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

RETL
RETL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
RETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
RETL Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
RETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
RETL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBOT vs. RETL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) and Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UBOTRETLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.10

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

0.53

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.14

1.08

+1.07

UBOT vs. RETL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is higher than the RETL Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBOT and RETL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UBOT vs. RETL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBOT drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, smaller than the maximum RETL drawdown of -92.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBOT and RETL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBOTRETLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.24%

-92.00%

+5.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.90%

-38.08%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.64%

-62.72%

+11.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.90%

-92.00%

+9.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.26%

-82.95%

+30.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.81%

-37.62%

-12.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.67%

18.57%

-6.90%

Volatility

UBOT vs. RETL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) has a higher volatility of 17.69% compared to Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) at 16.60%. This indicates that UBOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RETL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBOTRETLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.69%

16.60%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.70%

40.99%

-2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.90%

60.71%

-10.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.27%

79.51%

-26.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.55%

79.80%

-16.25%

UBOT vs. RETL - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBOT has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than RETL's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBOT vs. RETL - Dividend Comparison

UBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than RETL's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
0.51%0.58%1.13%1.35%0.71%0.22%0.19%0.92%1.19%0.01%2.60%
UBOT
Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares
0.94%0.78%1.45%0.65%0.00%2.25%15.83%0.55%0.33%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBOT and RETL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UBOT has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to RETL (16.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBOT dropped -86.24% vs RETL's -92.00%.

On 5-year performance, UBOT leads with -9.40% vs -27.38% for RETL. On fees, RETL is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, RETL has been the lower-risk option at 16.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UBOT has performed better with a -9.40% return vs -27.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RETL is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for UBOT.

UBOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.51% for RETL.

UBOT is categorized as Robotics, while RETL is Leveraged Equities. UBOT tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index (300%), while RETL tracks Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.29% for UBOT and 0.99% for RETL.

UBOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBOT and RETL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer