UBOT vs. GDXU
UBOT (Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares) and GDXU (MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040) are both exchange-traded funds - UBOT is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index (300%), while GDXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UBOT returned -10.84%/yr vs -11.66%/yr for GDXU. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UBOT charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for GDXU.
Performance
UBOT vs. GDXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBOT achieves a -14.56% return, which is significantly higher than GDXU's -68.01% return.
UBOT
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -18.55%
- 6M
- -18.05%
- YTD
- -14.56%
- 1Y
- -1.35%
- 3Y*
- -0.24%
- 5Y*
- -10.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -7.19%
GDXU
- 1D
- 15.40%
- 1M
- -31.80%
- 6M
- -80.76%
- YTD
- -68.01%
- 1Y
- 4.23%
- 3Y*
- 23.50%
- 5Y*
- -11.66%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -18.29%
UBOT vs. GDXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBOT Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares | -14.56% | 13.42% | 12.02% | 72.59% | -72.45% | 9.78% | 4.50% |
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 | -68.01% | 796.47% | -18.60% | -21.36% | -62.82% | -54.93% | 4.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBOT and GDXU is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020 | 0.33 |
UBOT vs. GDXU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UBOT
GDXU
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
UBOT
GDXU
-
Technology
UBOT
GDXU
-
Healthcare
UBOT
GDXU
-
Consumer Cyclical
UBOT
GDXU
-
Communication Services
UBOT
GDXU
-
Financial Services
UBOT
GDXU
-
Energy
UBOT
GDXU
-
Consumer Defensive
UBOT
GDXU
-
Basic Materials
UBOT
GDXU
Utilities
UBOT
GDXU
-
Real Estate
UBOT
-
GDXU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBOT vs. GDXU — Risk / Return Rank
UBOT
GDXU
UBOT vs. GDXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UBOT | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.14 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 0.05 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | 0.09 | -0.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UBOT vs. GDXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBOT drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, smaller than the maximum GDXU drawdown of -94.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBOT and GDXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBOT | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.24% | -94.39% | +8.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.90% | -87.14% | +51.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.64% | -87.14% | +35.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.90% | -91.30% | +8.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.63% | -85.15% | +26.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.86% | -70.00% | +20.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.95% | 46.28% | -32.33% |
Volatility
UBOT vs. GDXU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) is 19.42%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a volatility of 38.61%. This indicates that UBOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBOT | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.42% | 38.61% | -19.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.46% | 127.15% | -84.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.53% | 146.85% | -94.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.88% | 113.16% | -59.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.57% | 111.49% | -47.92% |
UBOT vs. GDXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBOT has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
UBOT vs. GDXU - Dividend Comparison
UBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UBOT Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares | 1.15% | 0.78% | 1.45% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 2.25% | 15.83% | 0.55% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBOT and GDXU have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXU has higher volatility (38.61%) compared to UBOT (19.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBOT dropped -86.24% vs GDXU's -94.39%.
On 5-year performance, UBOT leads with -10.84% vs -11.66% for GDXU. On fees, GDXU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UBOT has been the lower-risk option at 19.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UBOT has performed better with a -10.84% return vs -11.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDXU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for UBOT.
UBOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for GDXU.
UBOT is categorized as Robotics, while GDXU is Leveraged Equities. UBOT tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index (300%), while GDXU tracks S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for UBOT and 0.95% for GDXU.
GDXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UBOT and GDXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer