UBEW vs. MAGY
UBEW (Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF) and MAGY (Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UBEW is a fund fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MAGY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
UBEW vs. MAGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBEW achieves a -15.76% return, which is significantly lower than MAGY's -1.50% return.
UBEW
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -3.71%
- YTD
- -15.76%
- 6M
- -26.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGY
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- -1.50%
- 6M
- -0.71%
- 1Y
- 13.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UBEW vs. MAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UBEW Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF | -15.76% | -17.23% |
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | -1.50% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBEW and MAGY is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBEW vs. MAGY — Risk / Return Rank
UBEW
MAGY
UBEW vs. MAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF (UBEW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBEW | MAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.07 | 1.53 | -2.60 |
Drawdowns
UBEW vs. MAGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBEW drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, which is greater than MAGY's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBEW and MAGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBEW | MAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.34% | -14.29% | -23.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.82% | -3.64% | -31.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.96% | -2.69% | -22.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.29% | — |
Volatility
UBEW vs. MAGY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBEW | MAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.34% | 14.38% | +27.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.34% | 14.57% | +27.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.34% | 14.57% | +27.77% |
UBEW vs. MAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UBEW and MAGY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
UBEW vs. MAGY - Dividend Comparison
UBEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.85%, less than MAGY's 37.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | 37.35% | 23.38% |
UBEW Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF | 31.85% | 8.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBEW and MAGY have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UBEW and MAGY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 37.35%, compared with 31.85% for UBEW.
Find the right allocation for UBEW and MAGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer