PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBEW vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBEW vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF (UBEW) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBEW achieves a -17.10% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.53% return.


UBEW

1D
-2.28%
1M
-12.95%
YTD
-17.10%
6M
-27.95%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BIL

1D
0.04%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.53%
6M
1.78%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBEW vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
UBEW
Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF
-17.10%-17.23%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.53%0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between UBEW and BIL is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBEW vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBEW

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBEW vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF (UBEW) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UBEW vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBEWBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

13.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

8.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.09

2.78

-3.87

Drawdowns

UBEW vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBEW drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBEW and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBEWBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.34%

-0.78%

-36.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.86%

0.00%

-35.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.10%

-0.26%

-24.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

UBEW vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBEWBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.16%

0.20%

+41.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.16%

0.26%

+41.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.16%

0.26%

+41.90%

UBEW vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBEW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBEW vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

UBEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.36%, more than BIL's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%
UBEW
Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF
32.36%8.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBEW and BIL have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UBEW.

UBEW has the higher dividend yield at 32.36%, compared with 3.86% for BIL.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UBEW and 0.14% for BIL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBEW and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer