UBEW vs. BIL
UBEW (Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UBEW is a fund fund actively managed by Roundhill, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. UBEW is actively managed, while BIL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. UBEW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.
Performance
UBEW vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBEW achieves a -17.10% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.53% return.
UBEW
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -12.95%
- YTD
- -17.10%
- 6M
- -27.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIL
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- 2.18%
UBEW vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UBEW Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF | -17.10% | -17.23% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.53% | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBEW and BIL is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBEW vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
UBEW
BIL
UBEW vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF (UBEW) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBEW | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 19.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 13.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 8.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.09 | 2.78 | -3.87 |
Drawdowns
UBEW vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBEW drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBEW and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBEW | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.34% | -0.78% | -36.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.86% | 0.00% | -35.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.10% | -0.26% | -24.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
UBEW vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBEW | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.16% | 0.20% | +41.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.16% | 0.26% | +41.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.16% | 0.26% | +41.90% |
UBEW vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBEW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
UBEW vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
UBEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.36%, more than BIL's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.86% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
UBEW Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF | 32.36% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBEW and BIL have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UBEW.
UBEW has the higher dividend yield at 32.36%, compared with 3.86% for BIL.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UBEW and 0.14% for BIL.
Find the right allocation for UBEW and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer