PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBER vs. KAP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UBER vs. KAP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) and National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR (KAP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBER achieves a -15.74% return, which is significantly lower than KAP.L's 24.37% return.


UBER

1D
-1.01%
1M
-7.82%
YTD
-15.74%
6M
-19.10%
1Y
-17.97%
3Y*
18.47%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*

KAP.L

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
24.37%
6M
19.24%
1Y
78.84%
3Y*
43.77%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBER vs. KAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
-15.74%35.46%-2.03%148.97%-41.02%-17.78%71.49%-29.19%
KAP.L
National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR
24.37%56.56%-1.41%55.12%-17.73%114.56%48.37%-10.52%

Correlation

The correlation between UBER and KAP.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UBER:

$142.62B

KAP.L:

$17.79B

EPS

UBER:

$4.05

KAP.L:

KZT 2.07K

PE Ratio

UBER:

16.98

KAP.L:

0.03

PEG Ratio

UBER:

0.11

KAP.L:

0.00

PS Ratio

UBER:

2.70

KAP.L:

0.01

PB Ratio

UBER:

5.76

KAP.L:

0.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

UBER:

$53.69B

KAP.L:

KZT 1.73T

Gross Profit (TTM)

UBER:

$22.03B

KAP.L:

KZT 827.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

UBER:

$5.85B

KAP.L:

KZT 933.88B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBER vs. KAP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBER
UBER Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
UBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBER Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
UBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBER Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

KAP.L
KAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
KAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
KAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
KAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
KAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBER vs. KAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) and National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR (KAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UBERKAP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.29

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

2.98

-3.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.09

8.71

-9.80

UBER vs. KAP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBER Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the KAP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBER and KAP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UBER vs. KAP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBER drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than KAP.L's maximum drawdown of -49.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBER and KAP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBERKAP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.05%

-49.67%

-18.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.46%

-25.44%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.46%

-32.99%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.45%

-49.67%

-10.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.22%

-23.90%

-7.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.67%

-14.95%

-10.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.93%

8.73%

+9.20%

Volatility

UBER vs. KAP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) is 7.96%, while National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR (KAP.L) has a volatility of 10.50%. This indicates that UBER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KAP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBERKAP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

10.50%

-2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.21%

37.79%

-14.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.66%

46.86%

-14.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.82%

47.13%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.61%

42.86%

+7.75%

Dividends

UBER vs. KAP.L - Dividend Comparison

UBER has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KAP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
KAP.L
National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR
3.56%4.43%7.27%4.26%6.44%3.69%5.14%6.23%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

UBER vs. KAP.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Uber Technologies, Inc. and National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00B200.00B300.00B400.00B500.00B600.00B700.00B20222023202420252026
13.20B
154.22B
(UBER) Total Revenue
(KAP.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. UBER values in USD, KAP.L values in KZT

UBER vs. KAP.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Uber Technologies, Inc. and National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
45.0%
32.5%
Portfolio components
UBER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.95B and revenue of 13.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.

KAP.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR reported a gross profit of 50.17B and revenue of 154.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.

UBER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92B and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.

KAP.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR reported an operating income of 34.96B and revenue of 154.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.7%.

UBER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 263.00M and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.

KAP.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR reported a net income of -7.88B and revenue of 154.22B, resulting in a net margin of -5.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UBER and KAP.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBER and KAP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer