UB12.L vs. CMU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UB12.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds - UB12.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while CMU.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UB12.L returned 10.20%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for CMU.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UB12.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.

Performance

UB12.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB12.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UB12.L achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return. Over the past 10 years, UB12.L has underperformed CMU.L with an annualized return of 10.20%, while CMU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.79% annualized return.

UB12.L

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 3.53%
• YTD: 6.75%
• 6M: 8.80%
• 1Y: 19.32%
• 3Y*: 13.86%
• 5Y*: 10.14%
• 10Y*: 10.20%

CMU.L

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 8.13%
• YTD: 15.89%
• 6M: 17.12%
• 1Y: 29.56%
• 3Y*: 16.11%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: 10.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UB12.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UB12.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis	6.75%	25.97%	3.91%	13.08%	-3.54%	16.84%	2.37%	19.34%	-9.57%	15.00%
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select	15.89%	25.71%	1.42%	14.39%	-5.30%	13.03%	4.59%	19.05%	-11.56%	17.21%

Correlation

The correlation between UB12.L and CMU.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2013	0.94

The correlation between UB12.L and CMU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

UB12.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UB12.L	CMU.L
Financial Services	23.2%	21.8%
Industrials	19.6%	15.7%
Healthcare	12.9%	4.2%
Technology	9.4%	30.8%
Consumer Defensive	8.6%	5.2%
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	10.1%
Basic Materials	5.6%	2.8%
Energy	5.0%	0.0%
Utilities	4.8%	5.8%
Communication Services	3.8%	2.3%
Real Estate	0.8%	1.3%

Return for Risk

UB12.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UB12.L

UB12.L Risk / Return Rank: 43
UB12.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
UB12.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
UB12.L Omega Ratio Rank: 48
UB12.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
UB12.L Martin Ratio Rank: 41

CMU.L

CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UB12.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB12.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UB12.L	CMU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.98	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	2.79	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.37	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	2.58	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.36	9.67	-3.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UB12.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UB12.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UB12.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UB12.L	CMU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	1.98	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.66	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	0.65	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.49	+0.10

Drawdowns

UB12.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UB12.L drawdown since its inception was -28.66%, smaller than the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB12.L and CMU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UB12.L	CMU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.66%	-32.53%	+3.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.68%	-11.43%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.68%	-11.95%	-0.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.68%	-21.11%	+5.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.66%	-31.41%	+2.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.52%	-0.18%	-1.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.19%	-5.80%	+1.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	3.05%	-0.02%

Volatility

UB12.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB12.L) is 3.88%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that UB12.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UB12.L	CMU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	5.34%	-1.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.18%	12.44%	-2.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.11%	14.86%	-2.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.69%	16.00%	-2.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.87%	16.78%	-1.91%

UB12.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UB12.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UB12.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

UB12.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, while CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UB12.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis	3.18%	2.45%	2.75%	2.73%	2.73%	2.08%	2.03%	3.07%	3.33%	2.90%	3.73%	3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UB12.L and CMU.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, UB12.L and CMU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, UB12.L or CMU.L?

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UB12.L or CMU.L?

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UB12.L.

What is the main difference between UB12.L and CMU.L?

UB12.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UB12.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.