PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UB06.L vs. CMU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UB06.L vs. CMU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UB06.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, from UBS and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UB06.L returned 11.04%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for CMU.L. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UB06.L charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.

Performance

UB06.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB06.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UB06.L achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UB06.L having a 11.04% annualized return and CMU.L not far behind at 10.79%.

UB06.L

1D
0.42%
1M
4.96%
YTD
7.99%
6M
9.65%
1Y
21.21%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
11.04%

CMU.L

1D
0.33%
1M
8.13%
YTD
15.89%
6M
17.12%
1Y
29.56%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UB06.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UB06.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis		7.99%30.63%4.81%16.43%-6.51%14.17%5.04%18.97%-11.33%17.27%
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select		15.89%25.71%1.42%14.39%-5.30%13.03%4.59%19.05%-11.56%17.21%

Correlation

The correlation between UB06.L and CMU.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2012

0.95

The correlation between UB06.L and CMU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

UB06.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
UB06.L
CMU.L

Financial Services

24.0%
21.8%

Industrials

20.7%
15.7%

Technology

15.7%
30.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
10.1%

Utilities

6.6%
5.8%

Healthcare

5.8%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
5.2%

Communication Services

4.4%
2.3%

Energy

4.2%
0.0%

Basic Materials

4.0%
2.8%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.3%

Financial Services

UB06.L
24.0%
CMU.L
21.8%

Industrials

UB06.L
20.7%
CMU.L
15.7%

Technology

UB06.L
15.7%
CMU.L
30.8%

Consumer Cyclical

UB06.L
8.3%
CMU.L
10.1%

Utilities

UB06.L
6.6%
CMU.L
5.8%

Healthcare

UB06.L
5.8%
CMU.L
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

UB06.L
5.5%
CMU.L
5.2%

Communication Services

UB06.L
4.4%
CMU.L
2.3%

Energy

UB06.L
4.2%
CMU.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

UB06.L
4.0%
CMU.L
2.8%

Real Estate

UB06.L
0.9%
CMU.L
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis

Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select

Often compared with UB06.L:
UB06.L vs. CEMU.ASUB06.L vs. C001.DEUB06.L vs. 5ESG.LUB06.L vs. IMV.LUB06.L vs. CS1.LUB06.L vs. UC15.LUB06.L vs. WDEP.L
Often compared with CMU.L:
CMU.L vs. CEUR.LCMU.L vs. GLDCMU.L vs. FLXD.LCMU.L vs. 100D.LCMU.L vs. 500G.LCMU.L vs. 500U.LCMU.L vs. BNKE.L

Return for Risk

UB06.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UB06.L
UB06.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
UB06.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB06.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB06.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
UB06.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB06.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
CMU.L
CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UB06.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB06.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UB06.LCMU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.50
1.98

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.17
2.79

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

2.58

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.82

9.67

-2.85

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UB06.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UB06.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UB06.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UB06.LCMU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

1.98

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.66

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.65

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.49

+0.19

Drawdowns

UB06.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UB06.L drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, roughly equal to the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB06.L and CMU.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UB06.LCMU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.36%

-32.53%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.91%

-11.43%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.04%

-11.95%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.60%

-21.11%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.36%

-31.41%

+0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.18%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-5.80%

+0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

3.05%

+0.05%

Volatility

UB06.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB06.L) is 4.48%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that UB06.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UB06.LCMU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

5.34%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.63%

12.44%

-0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.08%

14.86%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

16.00%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.82%

16.78%

+0.04%

UB06.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UB06.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UB06.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

UB06.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, while CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UB06.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis		2.47%2.49%2.80%2.68%2.68%1.88%1.57%2.84%3.20%2.52%2.50%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.94, UB06.L and CMU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for UB06.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for UB06.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UB06.L and CMU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer