UAUG vs. LJUL
UAUG (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August) and LJUL (Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. UAUG is passively managed, while LJUL is actively managed. Over the past year, UAUG returned 15.19% vs 5.49% for LJUL. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
UAUG vs. LJUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UAUG achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly higher than LJUL's 1.80% return.
UAUG
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- 15.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- —
LJUL
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UAUG vs. LJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August | 4.84% | 12.42% | 5.40% |
LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July | 1.80% | 5.91% | 3.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between UAUG and LJUL is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024 | 0.70 |
The correlation between UAUG and LJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UAUG vs. LJUL — Risk / Return Rank
UAUG
LJUL
UAUG vs. LJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August (UAUG) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UAUG | LJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.86 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.85 | 10.51 | -6.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.38 | 53.01 | -32.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UAUG | LJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | 3.48 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 1.78 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
UAUG vs. LJUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UAUG drawdown since its inception was -13.91%, which is greater than LJUL's maximum drawdown of -3.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAUG and LJUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UAUG | LJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.91% | -3.21% | -10.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.96% | -0.52% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.04% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -0.12% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 0.10% | +0.65% |
Volatility
UAUG vs. LJUL - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August (UAUG) has a higher volatility of 0.60% compared to Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL) at 0.22%. This indicates that UAUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UAUG | LJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | 0.22% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.13% | 1.06% | +3.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.51% | 1.58% | +3.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.89% | 3.25% | +4.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.72% | 3.25% | +5.47% |
UAUG vs. LJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UAUG and LJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
UAUG vs. LJUL - Dividend Comparison
UAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LJUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July | 5.23% | 5.36% | 2.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UAUG and LJUL have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UAUG has higher volatility (0.60%) compared to LJUL (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAUG dropped -13.91% vs LJUL's -3.21%.
On 1-year performance, UAUG leads with 15.19% vs 5.49% for LJUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, LJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UAUG has performed better with a 15.19% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UAUG and LJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
LJUL has the higher dividend yield at 5.23%, compared with 0.00% for UAUG.
LJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UAUG and LJUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer