PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UAPR vs. POCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UAPR vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAPR achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly higher than POCT's 5.33% return.


UAPR

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.43%
YTD
6.99%
6M
7.70%
1Y
14.02%
3Y*
11.14%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*

POCT

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.01%
YTD
5.33%
6M
5.92%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
12.17%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UAPR vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April
6.99%6.27%12.38%10.60%-5.67%5.32%-5.05%6.74%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
5.33%11.00%9.54%20.12%-1.26%9.46%10.40%4.60%

Correlation

The correlation between UAPR and POCT is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2019

0.79

The correlation between UAPR and POCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

UAPR vs. POCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UAPR
POCT

Technology

33.6%
36.2%

Financial Services

12.2%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.5%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
10.1%

Healthcare

9.5%
8.4%

Industrials

8.5%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
4.9%

Energy

4.0%
3.5%

Utilities

2.6%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.8%

Technology

UAPR
33.6%
POCT
36.2%

Financial Services

UAPR
12.2%
POCT
11.9%

Communication Services

UAPR
10.5%
POCT
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

UAPR
10.0%
POCT
10.1%

Healthcare

UAPR
9.5%
POCT
8.4%

Industrials

UAPR
8.5%
POCT
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

UAPR
5.3%
POCT
4.9%

Energy

UAPR
4.0%
POCT
3.5%

Utilities

UAPR
2.6%
POCT
2.3%

Real Estate

UAPR
2.0%
POCT
1.9%

Basic Materials

UAPR
1.9%
POCT
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UAPR vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UAPR
UAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
UAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
UAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

POCT
POCT Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UAPR vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UAPRPOCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.06

1.47

+0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.51

3.28

+11.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

71.55

16.84

+54.72

UAPR vs. POCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UAPR Sharpe Ratio is 4.40, which is higher than the POCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAPR and POCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UAPRPOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.40

2.35

+2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

1.24

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.87

-0.27

Drawdowns

UAPR vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAPR drawdown since its inception was -14.61%, smaller than the maximum POCT drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAPR and POCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UAPRPOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.61%

-18.80%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.97%

-4.40%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.84%

-10.22%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.84%

-10.22%

-0.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.20%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.31%

-1.50%

-1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

0.86%

-0.66%

Volatility

UAPR vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) is 0.78%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) has a volatility of 0.94%. This indicates that UAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UAPRPOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

0.94%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.26%

4.77%

-2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20%

6.17%

-2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.88%

7.94%

-1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.42%

10.22%

-1.80%

UAPR vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UAPR and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

UAPR vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither UAPR nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.21%
UAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


UAPR and POCT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POCT has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to UAPR (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAPR dropped -14.61% vs POCT's -18.80%.

On 5-year performance, POCT leads with 9.82% vs 6.54% for UAPR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, UAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, POCT has performed better with a 9.82% return vs 6.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UAPR and POCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

UAPR and POCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

UAPR tracks S&P 500, while POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index.

UAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.40 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UAPR and POCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer