UAPR vs. OCTB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April) and OCTB (Aptus October Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. UAPR is passively managed, while OCTB is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for OCTB.

Performance

UAPR vs. OCTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) and Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAPR achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly higher than OCTB's 6.18% return.

UAPR

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.43%
• YTD: 6.99%
• 6M: 7.70%
• 1Y: 14.02%
• 3Y*: 11.14%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: —

OCTB

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 2.41%
• YTD: 6.18%
• 6M: 6.75%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UAPR vs. OCTB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April	6.99%	2.01%
OCTB Aptus October Buffer ETF	6.18%	2.37%

Correlation

The correlation between UAPR and OCTB is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

UAPR vs. OCTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UAPR

UAPR Risk / Return Rank: 98
UAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
UAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
UAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
UAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
UAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UAPR vs. OCTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) and Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UAPR	OCTB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.40	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.63	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.06	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	14.51	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	71.55	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UAPR	OCTB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	1.97	-1.37

Drawdowns

UAPR vs. OCTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAPR drawdown since its inception was -14.61%, which is greater than OCTB's maximum drawdown of -4.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAPR and OCTB.

Drawdown Indicators

	UAPR	OCTB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.61%	-4.79%	-9.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.17%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.31%	-0.70%	-2.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UAPR	OCTB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.78%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.26%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.20%	7.20%	-4.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.88%	7.20%	-0.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.42%	7.20%	+1.22%

UAPR vs. OCTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

UAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

UAPR vs. OCTB - Dividend Comparison

Neither UAPR nor OCTB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
OCTB Aptus October Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UAPR and OCTB in my portfolio?

UAPR and OCTB have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UAPR or OCTB?

On fees, OCTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UAPR or OCTB?

OCTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UAPR or OCTB?

UAPR and OCTB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between UAPR and OCTB?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UAPR and 0.25% for OCTB.