PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UAMY vs. IGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UAMY vs. IGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAMY achieves a 82.47% return, which is significantly higher than IGM's 31.32% return. Over the past 10 years, UAMY has outperformed IGM with an annualized return of 45.20%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively lower 25.19% annualized return.


UAMY

1D
-10.11%
1M
-22.04%
YTD
82.47%
6M
72.18%
1Y
244.36%
3Y*
203.89%
5Y*
57.05%
10Y*
45.20%

IGM

1D
-0.84%
1M
16.93%
YTD
31.32%
6M
29.19%
1Y
62.26%
3Y*
39.18%
5Y*
22.04%
10Y*
25.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UAMY vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UAMY
United States Antimony Corporation
82.47%183.62%610.84%-48.86%-2.19%-4.64%35.58%-33.62%81.25%27.49%
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
31.32%26.76%36.99%60.68%-35.83%25.72%45.11%41.81%2.26%37.20%

Correlation

The correlation between UAMY and IGM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2001

0.12

The correlation between UAMY and IGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UAMY vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UAMY
UAMY Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
UAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
UAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

IGM
IGM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UAMY vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UAMYIGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.50

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

3.81

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.78

13.36

-7.58

UAMY vs. IGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UAMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the IGM Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAMY and IGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UAMYIGMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

3.07

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.86

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

1.03

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.48

-0.41

Drawdowns

UAMY vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAMY drawdown since its inception was -96.44%, which is greater than IGM's maximum drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAMY and IGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UAMYIGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.44%

-65.59%

-30.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.30%

-16.44%

-57.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.30%

-26.39%

-47.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.46%

-40.68%

-39.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.76%

-40.68%

-49.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.57%

-0.84%

-46.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.43%

-15.23%

-51.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.51%

4.67%

+37.84%

Volatility

UAMY vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison

United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) has a higher volatility of 32.49% compared to iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) at 6.10%. This indicates that UAMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UAMYIGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.49%

6.10%

+26.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

92.81%

16.08%

+76.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

132.11%

20.43%

+111.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.88%

25.68%

+69.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.04%

24.54%

+76.50%

Dividends

UAMY vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison

UAMY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
0.12%0.17%0.22%0.33%0.66%0.16%0.32%0.50%0.57%0.57%0.90%0.79%
UAMY
United States Antimony Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UAMY and IGM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UAMY has higher volatility (32.49%) compared to IGM (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAMY dropped -96.44% vs IGM's -65.59%.

IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UAMY and IGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer