UA vs. OTIS
UA (Under Armour, Inc.) and OTIS (Otis Worldwide Corporation) are both stocks. UA operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical), while OTIS operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, UA returned -20.46%/yr vs -0.99%/yr for OTIS. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UA vs. OTIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UA achieves a 22.50% return, which is significantly higher than OTIS's -18.14% return.
UA
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 17.84%
- YTD
- 22.50%
- 6M
- 41.35%
- 1Y
- -4.85%
- 3Y*
- -5.28%
- 5Y*
- -20.46%
- 10Y*
- -16.19%
OTIS
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- -18.14%
- 6M
- -18.87%
- 1Y
- -24.67%
- 3Y*
- -5.09%
- 5Y*
- -0.99%
- 10Y*
- —
UA vs. OTIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UA Under Armour, Inc. | 22.50% | -35.66% | -10.66% | -6.39% | -50.55% | 21.24% | 101.35% |
OTIS Otis Worldwide Corporation | -18.14% | -3.99% | 5.17% | 16.04% | -8.76% | 30.41% | 70.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between UA and OTIS is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2020 | 0.40 |
The correlation between UA and OTIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UA:
$2.50B
OTIS:
$27.56B
UA:
-$1.16
OTIS:
$3.77
UA:
0.51
OTIS:
1.90
UA:
$4.97B
OTIS:
$14.65B
UA:
$2.26B
OTIS:
$4.45B
UA:
-$86.93M
OTIS:
$2.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UA vs. OTIS — Risk / Return Rank
UA
OTIS
UA vs. OTIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UA) and Otis Worldwide Corporation (OTIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UA | OTIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.81 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | -0.85 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.33 | -1.69 | +1.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UA vs. OTIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UA drawdown since its inception was -91.34%, which is greater than OTIS's maximum drawdown of -32.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UA and OTIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UA | OTIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.34% | -32.44% | -58.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.86% | -30.00% | -12.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.16% | -32.44% | -27.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.50% | -32.44% | -50.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.14% | -31.07% | -56.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.19% | -8.99% | -60.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.26% | 15.14% | +11.12% |
Volatility
UA vs. OTIS - Volatility Comparison
Under Armour, Inc. (UA) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to Otis Worldwide Corporation (OTIS) at 5.68%. This indicates that UA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OTIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UA | OTIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.83% | 5.68% | +6.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.31% | 16.38% | +26.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.90% | 23.57% | +30.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.27% | 22.11% | +28.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.37% | 25.85% | +24.52% |
Dividends
UA vs. OTIS - Dividend Comparison
UA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OTIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTIS Otis Worldwide Corporation | 2.40% | 1.89% | 1.63% | 1.46% | 1.42% | 1.06% | 0.89% |
UA Under Armour, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
UA vs. OTIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and Otis Worldwide Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UA vs. OTIS - Profitability Comparison
UA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a gross profit of 465.14M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.
OTIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Otis Worldwide Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 3.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.3%.
UA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported an operating income of -33.70M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.
OTIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Otis Worldwide Corporation reported an operating income of 539.00M and revenue of 3.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.
UA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a net income of -43.39M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.
OTIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Otis Worldwide Corporation reported a net income of 340.00M and revenue of 3.57B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UA and OTIS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UA has higher volatility (11.83%) compared to OTIS (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UA dropped -91.34% vs OTIS's -32.44%.
UA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UA and OTIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer