TZA vs. TSLL
TZA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares) and TSLL (Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. TZA is passively managed, while TSLL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TZA returned -44.69%/yr vs 9.79%/yr for TSLL. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. TZA charges 1.11%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for TSLL.
Performance
TZA vs. TSLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TZA achieves a -40.43% return, which is significantly lower than TSLL's -20.85% return.
TZA
- 1D
- 3.75%
- 1M
- -10.87%
- YTD
- -40.43%
- 6M
- -38.50%
- 1Y
- -65.59%
- 3Y*
- -44.69%
- 5Y*
- -30.11%
- 10Y*
- -43.15%
TSLL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 13.88%
- YTD
- -20.85%
- 6M
- -21.38%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TZA vs. TSLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | -40.43% | -40.22% | -32.22% | -41.19% | 9.38% |
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares | -20.85% | -26.80% | 99.63% | 139.86% | -73.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between TZA and TSLL is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022 | -0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TZA vs. TSLL — Risk / Return Rank
TZA
TSLL
TZA vs. TSLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares (TSLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TZA | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | 0.08 | -1.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.07 | 0.77 | -2.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.09 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 0.13 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.51 | 0.27 | -1.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TZA | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.16 | 0.08 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | -0.08 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
TZA vs. TSLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TZA drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than TSLL's maximum drawdown of -82.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TZA and TSLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TZA | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -82.88% | -17.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.28% | -54.75% | -12.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.34% | -82.88% | -5.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -60.03% | -39.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -98.00% | -53.82% | -44.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.51% | 26.72% | +16.79% |
Volatility
TZA vs. TSLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) is 17.03%, while Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares (TSLL) has a volatility of 24.26%. This indicates that TZA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TZA | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.03% | 24.26% | -7.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.64% | 54.47% | -13.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.05% | 92.38% | -35.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.43% | 106.87% | -39.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.91% | 106.87% | -37.96% |
TZA vs. TSLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TZA has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLL's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
TZA vs. TSLL - Dividend Comparison
TZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, less than TSLL's 6.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares | 6.46% | 5.00% | 2.47% | 4.44% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | 4.82% | 5.08% | 5.40% | 5.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.21% | 1.56% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TZA and TSLL have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLL has higher volatility (24.26%) compared to TZA (17.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TZA dropped -100.00% vs TSLL's -82.88%.
On 3-year performance, TSLL leads with 9.79% vs -44.69% for TZA. On fees, TSLL is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, TZA has been the lower-risk option at 17.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TSLL has performed better with a 9.79% return vs -44.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLL is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for TZA.
TSLL has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 4.82% for TZA.
Their fees differ too: 1.11% for TZA and 1.08% for TSLL.
TSLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TZA and TSLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer