TZA vs. LINT
TZA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. TZA is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.43, they often move in opposite directions. TZA charges 1.11%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.
Performance
TZA vs. LINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TZA achieves a -40.43% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 562.84% return.
TZA
- 1D
- 3.75%
- 1M
- -10.87%
- YTD
- -40.43%
- 6M
- -38.50%
- 1Y
- -65.59%
- 3Y*
- -44.69%
- 5Y*
- -30.11%
- 10Y*
- -43.15%
LINT
- 1D
- 9.00%
- 1M
- 30.35%
- YTD
- 562.84%
- 6M
- 362.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TZA vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | -40.43% | -16.33% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 562.84% | 5.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between TZA and LINT is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | -0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TZA vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank
TZA
LINT
TZA vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TZA | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.51 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TZA | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | 24.05 | -24.76 |
Drawdowns
TZA vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TZA drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TZA and LINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TZA | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -49.54% | -50.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -26.55% | -73.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -98.00% | -20.51% | -77.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.51% | — | — |
Volatility
TZA vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TZA | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.64% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.05% | 163.04% | -105.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.43% | 163.04% | -95.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.91% | 163.04% | -94.13% |
TZA vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TZA has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
TZA vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison
TZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, more than LINT's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.13% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | 4.82% | 5.08% | 5.40% | 5.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.21% | 1.56% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TZA and LINT have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for TZA.
TZA has the higher dividend yield at 4.82%, compared with 0.13% for LINT.
Their fees differ too: 1.11% for TZA and 0.97% for LINT.
Find the right allocation for TZA and LINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer