TZA vs. IFED
TZA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - TZA tracks the Russell 2000 Index (-300%) while IFED tracks the IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TZA returned -42.97%/yr vs 14.90%/yr for IFED. At a correlation of -0.78, they often move in opposite directions. TZA charges 1.11%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.
Performance
TZA vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TZA achieves a -44.60% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's -3.70% return.
TZA
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- 6M
- -33.75%
- YTD
- -44.60%
- 1Y
- -61.49%
- 3Y*
- -42.97%
- 5Y*
- -32.31%
- 10Y*
- -42.71%
IFED
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- -3.70%
- 1Y
- 0.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TZA vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | -44.60% | -40.22% | -32.22% | -41.19% | 30.21% | -12.80% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | -3.70% | 15.02% | 23.04% | 20.78% | -1.46% | 8.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between TZA and IFED is -0.59, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2021 | -0.78 |
The correlation between TZA and IFED shifts across timeframes, from -0.78 (all time) to -0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TZA vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
TZA
IFED
TZA vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TZA | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.02 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 0.04 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 0.10 | -1.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TZA vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TZA drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TZA and IFED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TZA | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -22.36% | -77.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.34% | -14.65% | -52.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.50% | -22.36% | -67.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -5.67% | -94.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -97.99% | -5.83% | -92.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.61% | 6.01% | +37.60% |
Volatility
TZA vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) has a higher volatility of 14.74% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 8.11%. This indicates that TZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TZA | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.74% | 8.11% | +6.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.49% | 15.09% | +27.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.13% | 17.79% | +40.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.54% | 20.02% | +47.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.81% | 20.02% | +48.79% |
TZA vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
TZA has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TZA vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
TZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | 4.78% | 5.08% | 5.40% | 5.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.21% | 1.56% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TZA and IFED have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TZA has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to IFED (8.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TZA dropped -100.00% vs IFED's -22.36%.
On 3-year performance, IFED leads with 14.90% vs -42.97% for TZA. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IFED has been the lower-risk option at 8.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IFED has performed better with a 14.90% return vs -42.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for TZA.
TZA has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.
TZA tracks Russell 2000 Index (-300%), while IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.11% for TZA and 0.45% for IFED.
IFED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TZA and IFED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer