PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TZA vs. DIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TZA vs. DIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TZA achieves a -40.43% return, which is significantly lower than DIG's 66.35% return. Over the past 10 years, TZA has underperformed DIG with an annualized return of -43.15%, while DIG has yielded a comparatively higher 5.32% annualized return.


TZA

1D
3.75%
1M
-10.87%
YTD
-40.43%
6M
-38.50%
1Y
-65.59%
3Y*
-44.69%
5Y*
-30.11%
10Y*
-43.15%

DIG

1D
2.57%
1M
-3.48%
YTD
66.35%
6M
59.45%
1Y
90.00%
3Y*
23.37%
5Y*
28.29%
10Y*
5.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TZA vs. DIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TZA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares
-40.43%-40.22%-32.22%-41.19%30.21%-50.80%-80.43%-53.25%25.06%-38.19%
DIG
ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas
66.35%2.73%0.93%-13.04%125.34%115.63%-70.36%12.51%-40.11%-7.39%

Correlation

The correlation between TZA and DIG is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2008

-0.61

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between TZA and DIG has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.61 to -0.05, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TZA vs. DIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TZA
TZA Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
TZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
TZA Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
TZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
TZA Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

DIG
DIG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TZA vs. DIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TZADIGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.16

2.22

-3.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.07

2.61

-4.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.33

-0.55

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

3.89

-4.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.51

10.65

-12.16

TZA vs. DIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TZA Sharpe Ratio is -1.16, which is lower than the DIG Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TZA and DIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TZADIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.16

2.22

-3.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

0.55

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.63

0.09

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.71

-0.00

-0.71

Drawdowns

TZA vs. DIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TZA drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum DIG drawdown of -97.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TZA and DIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TZADIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-97.04%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.28%

-23.29%

-43.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.34%

-42.41%

-45.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.83%

-46.02%

-44.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.71%

-92.53%

-7.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-51.27%

-48.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-98.00%

-64.37%

-33.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.51%

8.49%

+35.02%

Volatility

TZA vs. DIG - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG) have volatilities of 17.03% and 16.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TZADIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.03%

16.56%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.64%

33.14%

+7.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.05%

40.88%

+16.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.43%

51.59%

+15.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.91%

57.81%

+11.10%

TZA vs. DIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TZA has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than DIG's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TZA vs. DIG - Dividend Comparison

TZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, more than DIG's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIG
ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas
1.50%2.62%3.13%0.61%1.33%2.24%3.18%2.72%2.30%1.76%1.09%1.56%
TZA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares
4.82%5.08%5.40%5.49%0.00%0.00%1.21%1.56%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TZA and DIG have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TZA has higher volatility (17.03%) compared to DIG (16.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TZA dropped -100.00% vs DIG's -97.04%.

On 10-year performance, DIG leads with 5.32% vs -43.15% for TZA. On fees, DIG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DIG has been the lower-risk option at 16.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DIG has performed better with a 5.32% return vs -43.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for TZA.

TZA has the higher dividend yield at 4.82%, compared with 1.50% for DIG.

TZA tracks Russell 2000 Index (-300%), while DIG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.11% for TZA and 0.95% for DIG.

DIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TZA and DIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer