TYLG vs. ULTI
TYLG (Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF) and ULTI (REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. TYLG is passively managed, while ULTI is actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TYLG charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for ULTI.
Performance
TYLG vs. ULTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TYLG achieves a 24.03% return, which is significantly lower than ULTI's 43.46% return.
TYLG
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 12.68%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 6M
- 25.00%
- 1Y
- 48.51%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ULTI
- 1D
- -3.05%
- 1M
- 12.53%
- YTD
- 43.46%
- 6M
- 22.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TYLG vs. ULTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF | 24.03% | -1.06% |
ULTI REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF | 43.46% | -38.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between TYLG and ULTI is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TYLG vs. ULTI — Risk / Return Rank
TYLG
ULTI
TYLG vs. ULTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) and REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF (ULTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TYLG | ULTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.14 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.01 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TYLG | ULTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.47 | -0.31 | +1.77 |
Drawdowns
TYLG vs. ULTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TYLG drawdown since its inception was -24.01%, smaller than the maximum ULTI drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYLG and ULTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TYLG | ULTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.01% | -41.74% | +17.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -11.50% | +11.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -28.13% | +25.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | — | — |
Volatility
TYLG vs. ULTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TYLG | ULTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.54% | 62.43% | -46.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 62.43% | -43.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 62.43% | -43.26% |
TYLG vs. ULTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TYLG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ULTI's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
TYLG vs. ULTI - Dividend Comparison
TYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.47%, less than ULTI's 42.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF | 7.47% | 7.66% | 7.24% | 11.89% | 0.51% |
ULTI REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF | 42.53% | 14.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TYLG and ULTI have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TYLG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TYLG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for ULTI.
ULTI has the higher dividend yield at 42.53%, compared with 7.47% for TYLG.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TYLG and 1.25% for ULTI.
Find the right allocation for TYLG and ULTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer