PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TYLG vs. GOOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TYLG vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYLG achieves a 17.59% return, which is significantly higher than GOOY's 15.35% return.


TYLG

1D
1.38%
1M
-0.29%
6M
16.32%
YTD
17.59%
1Y
32.47%
3Y*
21.84%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
25.33%

GOOY

1D
3.69%
1M
1.69%
6M
6.23%
YTD
15.35%
1Y
70.54%
3Y*
25.61%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.33M$4.69M$7.86M
$118.02K$128.07K$139.81K

TYLG vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TYLG
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
17.59%16.84%20.57%7.06%
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
15.35%53.95%12.58%-3.35%

Correlation

The correlation between TYLG and GOOY is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2023

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TYLG vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TYLG
TYLG Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOY
GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TYLG vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TYLGGOOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.48

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

4.01

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.99

11.89

-1.90

TYLG vs. GOOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TYLG Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the GOOY Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TYLG and GOOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TYLG vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYLG drawdown since its inception was -24.01%, roughly equal to the maximum GOOY drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYLG and GOOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TYLGGOOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.01%

-24.40%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.78%

-17.70%

+6.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.01%

-24.40%

+0.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.60%

-7.22%

+1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

-6.46%

+3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

5.95%

-2.69%

Volatility

TYLG vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is 8.08%, while YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) has a volatility of 10.94%. This indicates that TYLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TYLGGOOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.08%

10.94%

-2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.64%

20.74%

-4.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.20%

25.85%

-6.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.73%

23.96%

-4.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.73%

23.96%

-4.23%

TYLG vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TYLG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TYLG vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison

TYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.78%, less than GOOY's 53.13% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
53.13%41.50%36.74%7.90%0.00%
TYLG
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
8.78%7.66%7.24%11.89%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


TYLG and GOOY have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOY has higher volatility (10.94%) compared to TYLG (8.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYLG dropped -24.01% vs GOOY's -24.40%.

On 3-year performance, GOOY leads with 25.61% vs 21.84% for TYLG. On fees, TYLG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, TYLG has been the lower-risk option at 8.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 25.61% return vs 21.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TYLG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOY.

GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 53.13%, compared with 8.78% for TYLG.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TYLG and 0.99% for GOOY.

GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TYLG and GOOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer