TYLG vs. GOOY
TYLG (Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF) and GOOY (YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. TYLG is passively managed, while GOOY is actively managed. Over the past year, TYLG returned 48.51% vs 88.26% for GOOY. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TYLG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GOOY.
Performance
TYLG vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TYLG achieves a 24.03% return, which is significantly higher than GOOY's 13.61% return.
TYLG
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 12.68%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 6M
- 25.00%
- 1Y
- 48.51%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOY
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- 13.61%
- 6M
- 11.36%
- 1Y
- 88.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TYLG vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF | 24.03% | 16.84% | 20.57% | 5.94% |
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 13.61% | 53.95% | 12.58% | -3.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between TYLG and GOOY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2023 | 0.52 |
The correlation between TYLG and GOOY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TYLG vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank
TYLG
GOOY
TYLG vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TYLG | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.65 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 5.50 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.36 | 21.08 | -1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TYLG | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14 | 3.84 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.47 | 1.09 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
TYLG vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TYLG drawdown since its inception was -24.01%, roughly equal to the maximum GOOY drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYLG and GOOY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TYLG | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.01% | -24.40% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.09% | -16.15% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -8.61% | +8.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -6.26% | +3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 4.20% | -1.69% |
Volatility
TYLG vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is 4.45%, while YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that TYLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TYLG | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 6.90% | -2.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | 17.19% | -4.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.54% | 23.19% | -7.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 23.31% | -4.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 23.31% | -4.14% |
TYLG vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TYLG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TYLG vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison
TYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.47%, less than GOOY's 50.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 50.99% | 41.50% | 36.74% | 7.90% | 0.00% |
TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF | 7.47% | 7.66% | 7.24% | 11.89% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TYLG and GOOY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOY has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to TYLG (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYLG dropped -24.01% vs GOOY's -24.40%.
On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 88.26% vs 48.51% for TYLG. On fees, TYLG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, TYLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 88.26% return vs 48.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TYLG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOY.
GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 50.99%, compared with 7.47% for TYLG.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TYLG and 0.99% for GOOY.
GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 3.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TYLG and GOOY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer