TYLG vs. ARMW
TYLG (Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. TYLG is passively managed, while ARMW is actively managed. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TYLG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.
Performance
TYLG vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TYLG achieves a 17.59% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 133.71% return.
TYLG
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 16.32%
- YTD
- 17.59%
- 1Y
- 32.47%
- 3Y*
- 21.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 25.33%
ARMW
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -28.93%
- 6M
- 143.26%
- YTD
- 133.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.40M | $4.54M | $4.17M | |
| $118.02K | $128.07K | $139.81K |
TYLG vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF | 17.59% | 2.62% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 133.71% | -41.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between TYLG and ARMW is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.63 |
TYLG vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TYLG
ARMW
Financial Services
-
Technology
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
TYLG
ARMW
-
Technology
TYLG
ARMW
Communication Services
TYLG
ARMW
-
Energy
TYLG
ARMW
-
Industrials
TYLG
ARMW
-
Basic Materials
TYLG
-
ARMW
-
Consumer Cyclical
TYLG
-
ARMW
-
Consumer Defensive
TYLG
-
ARMW
-
Healthcare
TYLG
-
ARMW
-
Real Estate
TYLG
-
ARMW
-
Utilities
TYLG
-
ARMW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TYLG vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank
TYLG
ARMW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TYLG vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TYLG | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.99 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TYLG vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TYLG drawdown since its inception was -24.01%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYLG and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TYLG | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.01% | -56.50% | +32.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.60% | -52.96% | +47.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -27.31% | +24.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | — | — |
Volatility
TYLG vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TYLG | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.64% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.20% | 95.78% | -76.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 95.78% | -76.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 95.78% | -76.05% |
TYLG vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TYLG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TYLG vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
TYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.78%, less than ARMW's 66.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 66.19% | 16.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF | 8.78% | 7.66% | 7.24% | 11.89% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TYLG and ARMW have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TYLG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TYLG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.
ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 66.19%, compared with 8.78% for TYLG.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TYLG and 0.99% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for TYLG and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer