TYLG vs. ARMW

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

TYLG (Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. TYLG is passively managed, while ARMW is actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TYLG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.

Performance

TYLG vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYLG achieves a 18.79% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 287.65% return.

TYLG

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 18.79%
• 6M: 17.74%
• 1Y: 37.15%
• 3Y*: 23.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMW

• 1D: -2.38%
• 1M: 19.11%
• YTD: 287.65%
• 6M: 278.87%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TYLG vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF	18.79%	2.62%
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	287.65%	-41.28%

Correlation

The correlation between TYLG and ARMW is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.61

TYLG vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TYLG	ARMW
Financial Services	54.2%	-
Technology	47.6%	28.9%
Energy	0.1%	-
Industrials	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TYLG vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TYLG

TYLG Risk / Return Rank: 76
TYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
TYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
TYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 74
TYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
TYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 80

ARMW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TYLG vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TYLG	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.70	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.88	—	—

Drawdowns

TYLG vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYLG drawdown since its inception was -24.01%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYLG and ARMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TYLG	ARMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.01%	-48.47%	+24.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.64%	-21.98%	+17.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.74%	-25.27%	+22.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TYLG	ARMW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.26%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.51%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.11%	94.53%	-77.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.44%	94.53%	-75.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.44%	94.53%	-75.09%

TYLG vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TYLG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

TYLG vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

TYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.16%, less than ARMW's 26.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	26.61%	16.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF	8.16%	7.66%	7.24%	11.89%	0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TYLG and ARMW in my portfolio?

TYLG and ARMW have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TYLG or ARMW?

On fees, TYLG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TYLG or ARMW?

TYLG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TYLG or ARMW?

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 26.61%, compared with 8.16% for TYLG.

What is the main difference between TYLG and ARMW?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TYLG and 0.99% for ARMW.