PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TYLD vs. YLDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TYLD vs. YLDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD) and ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF (YLDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYLD achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than YLDE's 4.09% return.


TYLD

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.92%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YLDE

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.13%
YTD
4.09%
6M
5.06%
1Y
13.89%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TYLD vs. YLDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TYLD
Cambria Tactical Yield ETF
1.50%4.05%5.15%
YLDE
ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF
4.09%13.09%16.88%

Correlation

The correlation between TYLD and YLDE is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2024

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TYLD vs. YLDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TYLD
TYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

YLDE
YLDE Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
YLDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YLDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
YLDE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
YLDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
YLDE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TYLD vs. YLDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD) and ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF (YLDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TYLDYLDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+8.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.55

1.26

+1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

34.31

1.84

+32.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

125.35

6.84

+118.51

TYLD vs. YLDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TYLD Sharpe Ratio is 5.42, which is higher than the YLDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TYLD and YLDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TYLDYLDEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.42

1.50

+3.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.53

0.75

+1.79

Drawdowns

TYLD vs. YLDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYLD drawdown since its inception was -1.06%, smaller than the maximum YLDE drawdown of -33.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYLD and YLDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TYLDYLDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.06%

-33.23%

+32.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.12%

-7.59%

+7.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.54%

+2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-3.55%

+3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

2.03%

-2.00%

Volatility

TYLD vs. YLDE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD) is 0.26%, while ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF (YLDE) has a volatility of 1.81%. This indicates that TYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YLDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TYLDYLDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.26%

1.81%

-1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.55%

6.74%

-6.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75%

9.31%

-8.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.77%

13.50%

-11.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.77%

15.76%

-13.99%

TYLD vs. YLDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than YLDE's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TYLD vs. YLDE - Dividend Comparison

TYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, less than YLDE's 7.04% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TYLD
Cambria Tactical Yield ETF
4.69%4.38%4.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YLDE
ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF
7.04%5.68%1.69%1.64%1.68%1.15%1.46%1.65%2.25%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


TYLD and YLDE have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YLDE has higher volatility (1.81%) compared to TYLD (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYLD dropped -1.06% vs YLDE's -33.23%.

On 1-year performance, YLDE leads with 13.89% vs 4.06% for TYLD. On fees, TYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YLDE has performed better with a 13.89% return vs 4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for YLDE.

YLDE has the higher dividend yield at 7.04%, compared with 4.69% for TYLD.

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TYLD and 0.60% for YLDE.

TYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.42 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TYLD and YLDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer