PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TYLD vs. XDQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TYLD vs. XDQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD) and Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYLD achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than XDQQ's 2.58% return.


TYLD

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.92%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDQQ

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.36%
YTD
2.58%
6M
2.48%
1Y
17.06%
3Y*
17.94%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TYLD vs. XDQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TYLD
Cambria Tactical Yield ETF
1.50%4.05%5.15%
XDQQ
Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly
2.58%13.75%35.62%

Correlation

The correlation between TYLD and XDQQ is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2024

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TYLD vs. XDQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TYLD
TYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

XDQQ
XDQQ Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
XDQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XDQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TYLD vs. XDQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD) and Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TYLDXDQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+9.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.55

1.26

+1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

34.31

1.45

+32.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

125.35

6.57

+118.78

TYLD vs. XDQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TYLD Sharpe Ratio is 5.42, which is higher than the XDQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TYLD and XDQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TYLDXDQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.42

1.24

+4.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.53

0.46

+2.07

Drawdowns

TYLD vs. XDQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYLD drawdown since its inception was -1.06%, smaller than the maximum XDQQ drawdown of -35.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYLD and XDQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TYLDXDQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.06%

-35.63%

+34.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.12%

-11.84%

+11.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.05%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-10.84%

+10.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

2.60%

-2.57%

Volatility

TYLD vs. XDQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD) is 0.26%, while Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) has a volatility of 0.40%. This indicates that TYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TYLDXDQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.26%

0.40%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.55%

11.13%

-10.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75%

13.81%

-13.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.77%

19.81%

-18.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.77%

19.66%

-17.89%

TYLD vs. XDQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than XDQQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

TYLD vs. XDQQ - Dividend Comparison

TYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, while XDQQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
TYLD
Cambria Tactical Yield ETF
4.69%4.38%4.24%
XDQQ
Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TYLD and XDQQ have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XDQQ has higher volatility (0.40%) compared to TYLD (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYLD dropped -1.06% vs XDQQ's -35.63%.

On 1-year performance, XDQQ leads with 17.06% vs 4.06% for TYLD. On fees, TYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XDQQ has performed better with a 17.06% return vs 4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDQQ.

TYLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 0.00% for XDQQ.

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TYLD and 0.79% for XDQQ.

TYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.42 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TYLD and XDQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer