TYD vs. NRGU

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

TYD (Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - TYD is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the NYSE 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while NRGU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TYD returned -1.08% vs 107.84% for NRGU. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. TYD charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGU.

Performance

TYD vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X (TYD) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYD achieves a -5.80% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 110.06% return.

TYD

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -0.25%
• YTD: -5.80%
• 6M: -5.59%
• 1Y: -1.08%
• 3Y*: -3.95%
• 5Y*: -13.19%
• 10Y*: -5.12%

NRGU

• 1D: 2.51%
• 1M: 2.05%
• YTD: 110.06%
• 6M: 87.26%
• 1Y: 107.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TYD vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TYD Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X	-5.80%	10.36%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	110.06%	-30.00%

Correlation

The correlation between TYD and NRGU is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	-0.21

TYD vs. NRGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TYD	NRGU
Financial Services	21.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TYD vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TYD

TYD Risk / Return Rank: 8
TYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
TYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
TYD Omega Ratio Rank: 8
TYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
TYD Martin Ratio Rank: 9

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 48
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 43
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TYD vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X (TYD) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TYD	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.08	1.44	-1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.01	1.98	-2.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.24	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.08	2.71	-2.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.20	6.55	-6.75

TYD vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TYD Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TYD and NRGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TYD vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYD drawdown since its inception was -64.28%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYD and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	TYD	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.28%	-57.50%	-6.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.54%	-39.95%	+26.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.06%	-27.55%	-31.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.00%	-25.35%	+3.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.30%	16.54%	-11.24%

Volatility

TYD vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X (TYD) is 4.49%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a volatility of 27.12%. This indicates that TYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TYD	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.49%	27.12%	-22.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.76%	62.47%	-52.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.86%	75.30%	-61.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.97%	88.96%	-65.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.36%	88.96%	-68.60%

TYD vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TYD has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

TYD vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

TYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TYD Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X	3.22%	2.97%	3.10%	2.71%	0.55%	0.00%	9.80%	0.92%	1.10%	0.01%	6.84%	1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TYD and NRGU in my portfolio?

TYD and NRGU have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TYD or NRGU?

NRGU has higher volatility (27.12%) compared to TYD (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYD dropped -64.28% vs NRGU's -57.50%.

Which ETF is better, TYD or NRGU?

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 107.84% vs -1.08% for TYD. On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TYD has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TYD or NRGU?

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 107.84% return vs -1.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TYD or NRGU?

NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for TYD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TYD or NRGU?

TYD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

What is the main difference between TYD and NRGU?

TYD is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while NRGU is Leveraged Equities. TYD tracks NYSE 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while NRGU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for TYD and 0.95% for NRGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.