PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TYA vs. VGLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TYA vs. VGLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TYA) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYA achieves a -5.34% return, which is significantly lower than VGLT's 0.49% return.


TYA

1D
0.27%
1M
0.70%
YTD
-5.34%
6M
-5.34%
1Y
-0.95%
3Y*
-1.87%
5Y*
10Y*

VGLT

1D
0.15%
1M
2.04%
YTD
0.49%
6M
0.38%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
-0.75%
5Y*
-5.58%
10Y*
-1.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TYA vs. VGLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TYA
Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF
-5.34%14.38%-9.63%-2.23%-37.62%-0.80%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
0.49%5.35%-6.28%3.27%-29.34%1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between TYA and VGLT is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021

0.89

The correlation between TYA and VGLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TYA vs. VGLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TYA
TYA Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYA Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYA Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

VGLT
VGLT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
VGLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VGLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TYA vs. VGLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TYA) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TYAVGLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.08

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

0.59

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.20

1.45

-1.65

TYA vs. VGLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TYA Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the VGLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TYA and VGLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TYA vs. VGLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYA drawdown since its inception was -51.15%, which is greater than VGLT's maximum drawdown of -46.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYA and VGLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TYAVGLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.15%

-46.18%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.80%

-7.01%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.36%

-17.68%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.65%

-36.26%

-5.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.88%

-15.12%

-20.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

2.82%

+1.85%

Volatility

TYA vs. VGLT - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TYA) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) at 2.08%. This indicates that TYA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TYAVGLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

2.08%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.14%

6.07%

+3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

8.61%

+4.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.50%

14.53%

+5.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.50%

13.80%

+6.70%

TYA vs. VGLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TYA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VGLT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TYA vs. VGLT - Dividend Comparison

TYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than VGLT's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TYA
Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF
3.88%3.85%4.84%4.28%2.23%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
4.57%4.44%4.33%3.33%2.84%1.82%2.15%2.46%2.71%2.55%2.69%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


TYA and VGLT have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TYA has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to VGLT (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYA dropped -51.15% vs VGLT's -46.18%.

On 3-year performance, VGLT leads with -0.75% vs -1.87% for TYA. On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VGLT has performed better with a -0.75% return vs -1.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TYA.

VGLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 3.88% for TYA.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TYA and 0.03% for VGLT.

VGLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TYA and VGLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer