TYA vs. SCHQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TYA (Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF) and SCHQ (Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. TYA is actively managed, while SCHQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TYA returned -2.45%/yr vs -0.72%/yr for SCHQ. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TYA charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHQ.

Performance

TYA vs. SCHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TYA) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYA achieves a -5.08% return, which is significantly lower than SCHQ's -0.43% return.

TYA

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -0.93%
• YTD: -5.08%
• 6M: -6.88%
• 1Y: 2.03%
• 3Y*: -2.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHQ

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: -0.43%
• 6M: -1.74%
• 1Y: 5.22%
• 3Y*: -0.72%
• 5Y*: -5.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TYA vs. SCHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TYA Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF	-5.08%	14.38%	-9.63%	-2.23%	-37.62%	-0.68%
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	-0.43%	5.50%	-6.44%	3.43%	-29.44%	2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between TYA and SCHQ is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021	0.89

The correlation between TYA and SCHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

TYA vs. SCHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TYA	SCHQ
Financial Services	24.7%	1.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	3.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	4.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TYA vs. SCHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TYA

TYA Risk / Return Rank: 10
TYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
TYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
TYA Omega Ratio Rank: 10
TYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
TYA Martin Ratio Rank: 11

SCHQ

SCHQ Risk / Return Rank: 17
SCHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SCHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
SCHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 16
SCHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
SCHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TYA vs. SCHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TYA) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TYA	SCHQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	0.59	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.32	0.91	-0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.10	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.17	0.75	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.49	1.94	-1.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TYA vs. SCHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TYA Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the SCHQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TYA and SCHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TYA	SCHQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	0.59	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.51	-0.25	-0.26

Drawdowns

TYA vs. SCHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYA drawdown since its inception was -51.15%, which is greater than SCHQ's maximum drawdown of -46.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYA and SCHQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TYA	SCHQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.15%	-46.13%	-5.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.80%	-7.01%	-4.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.51%	-17.65%	-4.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.49%	-36.82%	-4.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.85%	-26.36%	-9.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.17%	2.70%	+1.47%

Volatility

TYA vs. SCHQ - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TYA) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) at 2.57%. This indicates that TYA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TYA	SCHQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.11%	2.57%	+1.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.81%	5.94%	+2.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.91%	8.93%	+3.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.57%	14.54%	+6.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.57%	15.33%	+5.24%

TYA vs. SCHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TYA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHQ's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TYA vs. SCHQ - Dividend Comparison

TYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than SCHQ's 4.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	4.79%	4.54%	4.58%	3.79%	2.88%	1.69%	1.51%	0.44%
TYA Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF	3.87%	3.85%	4.84%	4.28%	2.23%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TYA and SCHQ in my portfolio?

TYA and SCHQ have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TYA or SCHQ?

TYA has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to SCHQ (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYA dropped -51.15% vs SCHQ's -46.13%.

Which ETF is better, TYA or SCHQ?

On 3-year performance, SCHQ leads with -0.72% vs -2.45% for TYA. On fees, SCHQ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHQ has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TYA or SCHQ?

Over the 3-year period, SCHQ has performed better with a -0.72% return vs -2.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TYA or SCHQ?

SCHQ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TYA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TYA or SCHQ?

SCHQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 3.87% for TYA.

What is the main difference between TYA and SCHQ?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TYA and 0.03% for SCHQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.