TYA vs. CTA
TYA (Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF) and CTA (Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TYA is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify, while CTA is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TYA returned -1.00%/yr vs 7.18%/yr for CTA. Their -0.35 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TYA charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for CTA.
Performance
TYA vs. CTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TYA achieves a -7.44% return, which is significantly lower than CTA's -0.51% return.
TYA
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -3.02%
- 6M
- -6.00%
- YTD
- -7.44%
- 1Y
- -6.08%
- 3Y*
- -1.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -10.67%
CTA
- 1D
- -3.35%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- 6M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 7.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.73M | $12.12M | $14.73M | |
| $293.95K | $302.74K | $683.37K |
TYA vs. CTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYA Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | -7.44% | 14.38% | -9.63% | -2.23% | -33.76% |
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | -0.51% | 0.88% | 24.15% | -2.23% | 9.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between TYA and CTA is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2022 | -0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TYA vs. CTA — Risk / Return Rank
TYA
CTA
TYA vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TYA) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TYA | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.05 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 0.20 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 0.54 | -1.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TYA vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TYA drawdown since its inception was -51.15%, which is greater than CTA's maximum drawdown of -20.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYA and CTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TYA | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.15% | -20.44% | -30.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.24% | -20.44% | +8.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.13% | -20.44% | +1.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.95% | -18.37% | -24.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.02% | -6.07% | -29.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.68% | 7.69% | -2.01% |
Volatility
TYA vs. CTA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TYA) is 3.30%, while Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) has a volatility of 9.14%. This indicates that TYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TYA | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 9.14% | -5.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | 19.11% | -9.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.99% | 21.67% | -9.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.35% | 16.99% | +3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.35% | 16.99% | +3.36% |
TYA vs. CTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
TYA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CTA's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
TYA vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison
TYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than CTA's 5.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.57% | 3.19% | 4.80% | 7.78% | 6.58% | 0.00% |
TYA Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | 3.74% | 3.85% | 4.84% | 4.28% | 2.23% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TYA and CTA have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTA has higher volatility (9.14%) compared to TYA (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYA dropped -51.15% vs CTA's -20.44%.
On 3-year performance, CTA leads with 7.18% vs -1.00% for TYA. On fees, TYA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TYA has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CTA has performed better with a 7.18% return vs -1.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TYA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for CTA.
CTA has the higher dividend yield at 5.57%, compared with 3.74% for TYA.
TYA is categorized as Government Bonds, while CTA is Systematic Trend. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TYA and 0.78% for CTA.
CTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TYA and CTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer